Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228666›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2015

Self-administered sample collection for screening of sexually transmitted infection among reservation-based American Indian youth.

Lauren Tingey, Rachel Strom, Ranelda Hastings, Anthony Parker, Allison Barlow, Anne Rompalo, Charlotte Gaydos

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of a Sexual and Reproductive Health Intervention for American Indian Adolescents on Predictors of Condom Use Intention.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren TingeyJohns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA ltingey1@jhu.edu.
Rachel StromJohns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ranelda HastingsJohns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anthony ParkerJohns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Allison BarlowJohns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anne RompaloJohns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Charlotte GaydosInternational Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
HIV Prevention Trials Network: Network LaboratoryU01AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2006 to 2010
$16.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958PHS HHS U26IHS300286/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American Indians suffer a disproportionate burden of sexually transmitted infection, particularly adolescents. Screening access barriers in rural and reservation-based communities necessitate alternatives to clinic-based options. Self-administered screening for three sexually transmitted infections was piloted among 32 American Indian adolescents aged 18 to 19. Participants self-collected in a private location; specimens were processed by trained, American Indian paraprofessionals and analysis was conducted by an outside laboratory. Participants testing positive were treated by a Public Health Nurse from the Indian Health Service. Results suggest high overall acceptability: 69% preferred a self-administered method over clinic-based screening, 75% would encourage their friends to use this method and 100% would use it again. A self-administered screening method has the ability to reach this and other high-risk populations that might not otherwise access screening, with added potential within the Indian Health Services system for uptake and dissemination in rural, reservation communities facing significant screening barriers.

Indexed as

Self CareAdolescentCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareSexually Transmitted DiseasesSpecimen HandlingUnited StatesUnited States Indian Health ServiceYoung AdultadolescentsAmerican IndianschlamydiadiagnosisgonorrheagonorrhoeaNorth AmericascreeningSexually transmitted infectiontrichomoniasis

Identifiers

PMID25228666
PMCPMC4382450
OpenAlexW2065788692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.