Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228589›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2014

Clinical outcomes of a novel combination of lenalidomide and rituximab followed by stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma.

Qingqing Cai, Yiming Chen, Dehui Zou, Liang Zhang, Maria Badillo, Shouhao Zhou, Elyse Lopez, Wenqi Jiang, Huiqiang Huang, Tongyu Lin and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. B-Cell Lymphoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Enable Drug Discovery and Are a Platform for Personalized Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingqing CaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China. Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yiming ChenDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dehui ZouLymphoma and Myeloma Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, State Key Lab of Experimental Methods of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union of Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Liang ZhangDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Maria BadilloDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Shouhao ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Elyse LopezDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Wenqi JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Huiqiang HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Tongyu LinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jorge RomagueraDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael WangDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSun Yat-sen University · CNInstitute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We retrospectively compared outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT) with stable disease or better following a novel combination of lenalidomide and rituximab (LR) treatment and did not undergo SCT in a phase I/II clinical trial. We retrospectively compared outcomes of patients who underwent SCT with that of patients who had stable disease or better following LR treatment and did not undergo SCT. Twenty-two patients enrolled in LR clinical trial and undergone SCT were identified, 13 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and nine with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). All patients who underwent SCT achieved complete response. In the MCL subset, there were no significant differences between SCT and non-SCT groups except that non-SCT patients were older and had a higher mantle-cell international prognostic index score. There was no difference between SCT-group and non-SCT-group in response duration (P=0.3), progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.304) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.87). In LBCL subgroup, there were no significant differences between two groups except that non-SCT group had a higher international prognostic index score. Patients with LBCL who underwent SCT had significantly longer response duration (P=0.001), PFS (P=0.000), and OS (P=0.003) than the non-SCT group. The novel therapeutic combination offers a bridge to SCT in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell NHL.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLenalidomideLymphoma, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesRituximabStem Cell TransplantationAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedLenalidomideRituximabThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID25228589
PMCPMC4202129
OpenAlexW2165047541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.