Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228587›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2015

HIV-1 subtype influences susceptibility and response to monotherapy with the protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir.

K A Sutherland, J Ghosn, J Gregson, J L Mbisa, M L Chaix, I Cohen Codar, J F Delfraissy, C Delaugerre, R K Gupta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Impact of HIV-1 subtypes on gross deletion in theJournal of ginseng research · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

K A SutherlandVirus Reference Department, Public Health England, London, UK Department of Infection, University College London, London, UK.
J GhosnUniversité Paris Descartes, EA 7327, Faculté de Médecine site Necker, Paris, France APHP, UF de thérapeutique en Immuno Infectiologie, CHU Hotel Dieu, Paris, France.
J GregsonDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
J L MbisaVirus Reference Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
M L ChaixUniversité Paris Descartes, EA 7327, Faculté de Médecine site Necker, Paris, France.
I Cohen CodarAbbVie Laboratory, Rungis, France.
J F DelfraissyAP-HP, Department of Internal Medicine, Bicetre University Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
C DelaugerreVirology, U941 INSERM Paris Diderot University, St Louis Hospital-APHP, Paris, France.
R K GuptaDepartment of Infection, University College London, London, UK ravindra.gupta@ucl.ac.uk.
Public Health England · GBAbbott (France) · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRInserm · FRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT093722MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePI susceptibility results from a complex interplay between protease and Gag proteins, with Gag showing wide variation across HIV-1 subtypes. We explored the impact of pre-treatment susceptibility on the outcome of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy.

methodsTreatment-naive individuals who experienced lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy failure from the MONARK study were matched (by subtype, viral load and baseline CD4 count) with those who achieved virological response ('successes'). Successes were defined by viral load <400 copies/mL after week 24 and <50 copies/mL from week 48 to week 96. Full-length Gag-protease was amplified from patient samples for in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing, with susceptibility expressed as fold change (FC) relative to a subtype B reference strain.

resultsBaseline lopinavir susceptibility was lower in viral failures compared with viral successes, but the differences were not statistically significant (median lopinavir susceptibility: 4.4 versus 8.5, respectively, P = 0.17). Among CRF02_AG/G patients, there was a significant difference in lopinavir susceptibility between the two groups (7.1 versus 10.4, P = 0.047), while in subtype B the difference was not significant (2.7 versus 3.4, P = 0.13). Subtype CRF02_AG/G viruses had a median lopinavir FC of 8.7 compared with 3.1 for subtype B (P = 0.001).

conclusionsWe report an association between reduced PI susceptibility (using full-length Gag-protease sequences) at baseline and subsequent virological failure on lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in antiretroviral-naive patients harbouring subtype CRF02_AG/G viruses. We speculate that this may be important in the context of suboptimal adherence in determining viral failure.

Indexed as

Femalegag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansLopinavirMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRitonavirSequence Analysis, DNATreatment Failuregag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsLopinavirRitonavirantiretroviral therapygagprotease inhibitorresistance

Identifiers

PMID25228587
PMCPMC4267506
OpenAlexW2161967914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.