Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228496›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2014

Early Viral Kinetics with Telbivudine, Tenofovir or Combination of Both in Immunotolerant Patients with Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B.

Nancy W Y Leung, Eva Herrmann, George K K Lau, Henry L Y Chan, Tokutei M K So, Stefan Zeuzem, Yu Dong, Aldo Trylesinski, Nikolai V Naoumov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nancy W Y Leung, 1501 Melbourne Plaza, 33 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong S.A.R., China. dr_nancyleung@yahoo.com.hk.
Eva HerrmannJohann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
George K K LauThe Institute of Translational Hepatology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing, China.
Henry L Y ChanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
Tokutei M K SoDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
Stefan ZeuzemKlinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Yu DongNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Aldo TrylesinskiNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nikolai V NaoumovNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHGoethe University Frankfurt · DE302 Military Hospital of China · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionViral kinetics has proved useful in understanding antiviral potency, determining antiviral profiles and optimizing treatment strategy.

methodsThis was a randomized, open-label study comparing the viral kinetics in 46 hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients during 12-week treatment with telbivudine monotherapy, tenofovir monotherapy or the combination of telbivudine plus tenofovir. A standard biphasic mathematical model was used to compare hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA decay parameters.

resultsForty-six patients received telbivudine (n = 16), tenofovir (n = 14) or telbivudine plus tenofovir (n = 16). From baseline to Week 12, the mean (SD) reduction in HBV DNA levels was not significantly different between treatment groups: -3.9 (0.9) log10 copies/mL in telbivudine group, -4.2 (0.7) log10 copies/mL in tenofovir group, and -4.4 (1.0) log10 copies/mL in combination group. No significant difference was observed among the three groups for viral clearance rate per day (0.97, 1.02, and 0.88, respectively) or for infected cell loss rate per day (0.04, 0.05, and 0.05, respectively). Antiviral efficiency in blocking viral production was similar in the monotherapy groups (median; 99.7% in telbivudine group and 99.4% in tenofovir group), but was slightly better and more homogeneous in the combination treatment group than in the monotherapy groups: mean (SD), 99.1% (0.8%) and 98.8% (1.6%), respectively (Wald-Wolfowitz test; P = 0.038). All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse event was reported during the study. Of the 46 patients in the safety population, 23 experienced adverse events. Most of the adverse events were not suspected to be related to the study drug by the investigators.

conclusionMonotherapy with telbivudine or tenofovir showed similar antiviral effectiveness in HBV DNA reduction and viral kinetics of HBV DNA decay. Efficiency in blocking viral production was slightly improved in the combination treatment group compared to the monotherapy groups.

Indexed as

Chronic hepatitis BCombination therapyHepatitis B virusInfectious diseasesTelbivudineTenofovirViral kinetics

Identifiers

PMID25228496
PMCPMC4269624
OpenAlexW2079880467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.