SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-cell pertussis vaccine in early infancy for the prevention of allergy in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Protective Effect of Contemporary Pertussis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Pooled it
- Safety and immunogenicity of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (acellular, three components) combined vaccine, adsorbed after three-dose priming in 2 months age infants: a randomized, blinded, controlled phase III clinical trial in China.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Controlled Human Infection With Bordetella pertussis Induces Asymptomatic, Immunizing Colonization.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Trial
- Factors associated with referring close contacts to an app with individually-tailored vaccine information.Vaccine · 2020Trial
- A phase I, randomized, controlled, dose-ranging study of investigational acellular pertussis (aP) and reduced tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (TdaP) booster vaccines in adults.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Trial
- Safety and immunogenicity of a combined Tetanus, Diphtheria, recombinant acellular Pertussis vaccine (TdaP) in healthy Thai adults.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Trial
- Update on Selected Adverse Events of Concern Following Immunization With Acellular Pertussis Vaccines, a Narrative Review.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Review
- Review
- Flow Cytometric Assessment of Pertactin- and Tetanus Toxoid-Specific B-Cell Kinetics After Tdap Booster Vaccination in Healthy Adults.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Article
- Breakthrough infections and incomplete vaccine efficacy drive pathogen immune escape.PloS one · 2026Article
- Navigating Vaccine Misinformation: Assessing Newly Licensed Physicians' Ability to Distinguish Facts from Fake News.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of 3 Types of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines Among Children Aged 3 Months-16 Years in Lu'an, China: A Matched Case-Control Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines in the Context of Long-Term Herd Immunity.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Childhood Combination Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRoutine use of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines was suspended in some countries in the 1970s and 1980s because of concerns about adverse effects. Following this action, there was a resurgence of whooping cough. Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, containing purified or recombinant Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) antigens, were developed in the hope that they would be as effective, but less reactogenic than the whole-cell vaccines. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999, and previously updated in 2012. In this update, we included no new studies.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of acellular pertussis vaccines in children and to compare them with the whole-cell vaccines. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL (2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1950 to January week 2, 2014), EMBASE (1974 to January 2014), Biosis Previews (2009 to January 2014) and CINAHL (2009 to January 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected double-blind randomised efficacy and safety trials of aP vaccines in children up to six years old, with active follow-up of participants and laboratory verification of pertussis cases. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the studies. Differences in trial design precluded a meta-analysis of the efficacy data. We pooled the safety data from individual trials using a random-effects meta-analysis model. MAIN
resultsWe included six efficacy trials with a total of 46,283 participants and 52 safety trials with a total of 136,541 participants. Most of the safety trials did not report the methods for random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding, which made it difficult to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The efficacy of multi-component (≥ three) vaccines varied from 84% to 85% in preventing typical whooping cough (characterised by 21 or more consecutive days of paroxysmal cough with confirmation of B. pertussis infection by culture, appropriate serology or contact with a household member who has culture-confirmed pertussis), and from 71% to 78% in preventing mild pertussis disease (characterised by seven or more consecutive days of cough with confirmation of B. pertussis infection by culture or appropriate serology). In contrast, the efficacy of one- and two-component vaccines varied from 59% to 78% against typical whooping cough and from 41% to 58% against mild pertussis disease. Multi-component acellular vaccines are more effective than low-efficacy whole-cell vaccines, but may be less effective than the highest-efficacy whole-cell vaccines. Most systemic and local adverse events were significantly less common with aP vaccines than with wP vaccines for the primary series as well as for the booster dose. AUTHORS'
conclusionsMulti-component (≥ three) aP vaccines are effective in preventing whooping cough in children. Multi-component aP vaccines have higher efficacy than low-efficacy wP vaccines, but they may be less efficacious than the highest-efficacy wP vaccines. Acellular vaccines have fewer adverse effects than whole-cell vaccines for the primary series as well as for booster doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.