ArticleHeredity2015
The effects of purifying selection on patterns of genetic differentiation between Drosophila melanogaster populations.
Article in Heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Circulation of Divergent Strains Supports Vector-Mediated Transmission of Rodent Hepacivirus J (Viruses · 2026Article
- Combining Individual-Based Radio-Tracking With Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Reveals Candidate for Genetic Basis of Partial Migration in a Songbird.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Next-generation data filtering in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Genomics of natural populations: gene conversion events reveal selected genes within the inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Regulatory and evolutionary impact of DNA methylation in two songbird species and their naturally occurring FBMC biology · 2024Article
- High Nucleotide Diversity Accompanies Differential DNA Methylation in Naturally Diverging Populations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Evolutionary Genomics of a Subdivided Species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Population-Genomic Analysis Identifies a Low Rate of Global Adaptive Fixation in the Proteins of the Cyclical Parthenogen Daphnia magna.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Transgenerational genomic analyses reveal allelic oscillation and purifying selection in a gut parasiteFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Single Amino Acid Substitution the DNA Repairing GeneFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Genomic differentiation across the speciation continuum in three hummingbird species pairs.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- A linked-read approach to museomics: Higher quality de novo genome assemblies from degraded tissues.Molecular ecology resources · 2020Article
- Genetics and evidence for balancing selection of a sex-linked colour polymorphism in a songbird.Nature communications · 2019Article
- A Single SNP Turns a Social Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Worker into a Selfish Parasite.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Methods for Estimating Demography and Detecting Between-Locus Differences in the Effective Population Size and Mutation Rate.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- The Effect of Balancing Selection on Population Differentiation: A Study with HLA Genes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- New Methods for Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects for INDELs and SNPs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Variation in the Intensity of Selection on Codon Bias over Time Causes Contrasting Patterns of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Changes in selective pressures associated with human population expansion may explain metabolic and immune related pathways enriched for signatures of positive selection.BMC genomics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using the data provided by the Drosophila Population Genomics Project, we investigate factors that affect the genetic differentiation between Rwandan and French populations of D. melanogaster. By examining within-population polymorphisms, we show that sites in long introns (especially those >2000 bp) have significantly lower π (nucleotide diversity) and more low-frequency variants (as measured by Tajima's D, minor allele frequencies, and prevalence of variants that are private to one of the two populations) than short introns, suggesting a positive relationship between intron length and selective constraint. A similar analysis of protein-coding polymorphisms shows that 0-fold (degenerate) sites in more conserved genes are under stronger purifying selection than those in less conserved genes. There is limited evidence that selection on codon bias has an effect on differentiation (as measured by FST) at 4-fold (degenerate) sites, and 4-fold sites and sites in 8-30 bp of short introns ⩽65 bp have comparable FST values. Consistent with the expected effect of purifying selection, sites in long introns and 0-fold sites in conserved genes are less differentiated than those in short introns and less conserved genes, respectively. Genes in non-crossover regions (for example, the fourth chromosome) have very high FST values at both 0-fold and 4-fold degenerate sites, which is probably because of the large reduction in within-population diversity caused by tight linkage between many selected sites. Our analyses also reveal subtle statistical properties of FST, which arise when information from multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms is combined and can lead to the masking of important signals of selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.