Trial reportFertility and sterility2014
When is clomiphene or gonadotropin intrauterine insemination futile? Results of the Fast Track and Standard Treatment Trial and the Forty and Over Treatment Trial, two prospective randomized controlled trials.
Trial report in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) of no benefit over single IUI among lesbian and single women seeking to conceive.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- Comparison of Effectiveness of Different Protocols Used for Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Intrauterine Insemination Cycle.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018Article
- Supply of and demand for assisted reproductive technologies in the United States: clinic- and population-based data, 1995-2010.Fertility and sterility · 2016Article
- Poor ovarian reserve.Journal of human reproductive sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether day 3 FSH and E2 levels at the upper limits of normal affect live-birth rates and treatment trajectory in a conventional versus "fast track" treatment program for IVF.
designSecondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials, FASTT and FORT-T.
settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): Infertile women ages 21-42 years randomized to conventional or accelerated treatment with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)-IUI and/or IVF (n=603 patients contributing 2,717 total cycles). INTERVENTION(S): Patients were stratified according to basal FSH and E2: FSH<10 mIU/mL and E2<40 pg/mL (group 1A), FSH<10 mIU/mL and E2≥40 pg/mL (group 1B), FSH, 10-15 mIU/mL and E2<40 pg/mL (group 2A), and FSH, 10-15 mIU/mL and E2≥40 pg/mL (group 2B). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of cancelled cycles, disenrollment for poor response, and cumulative live-birth rates per couple. RESULT(S): Women in groups 2A and 2B were more likely to have cancelled cycles and be disenrolled for poor response. While no live births occurred in group 2B during COH-IUI (0/19 couples, 0/58 cycles), IVF still afforded these patients a reasonable chance of success (6/18 couples, 6/40 cycles, 33.3% live-birth rate per couple). The specificity and positive predictive value of basal FSH of 10-15 mIU/mL and E2≥40 pg/mL for no live birth during COH-IUI treatment were both 100%. CONCLUSION(S): Women who initiated infertility treatment with FSH of 10-15 mIU/mL and E2≥40 pg/mL on day 3 testing were unlikely to achieve live birth after COH-IUI treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.