ArticleProtoplasma2015
Decoding cyanobacterial phylogeny and molecular evolution using an evonumeric approach.
Article in Protoplasma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Neowestiellopsis persica A1387 (Hapalosiphonaceae) based on the cpcA, psbA, rpoC1, nifH and nifD gene sequences.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Impact of dehydration on the physiochemical properties ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Structural Elucidation and Molecular Docking of a Novel Antibiotic Compound from CyanobacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forty-one heterocystous cyanobacteria strains representing 12 cyanobacterial genera collected from all across India were assessed in phylogenetic and evolutionary perspectives. The structural gene 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the functional genes nifD and psbA were selected as molecular chronometers in this study. The phylogenetic analyses demonstrated the monophyly of heterocystous cyanobacteria with significant intermixing, along with establishing the polyphyly of Stigonematales, strongly supporting the need for re-amendments in cyanobacterial taxonomy and systematics. Molecular trends obtained did not clearly reflect the phenotypic affiliations, thus advocating for genetic characterizations using more molecular markers. Large-scale evonumeric extrapolations of gene sequence data of all the three molecular markers was performed to assess the evolutionary pace of heterocystous cyanobacteria on the basis of nucleotide diversity, recombination frequencies, and the DNA divergence between the sampled taxa. The obtained results tilted the evolutionary pace in favor of the less complex Nostocales thus indicating that possibly the simple non-branched forms are more flexible and adaptive for evolutionary diversifications as compared to the more complex and branched ones. This study hence represents a unique blend of molecular phylogeny with evogenomic sequence analyses for understanding the genetic diversity, phylogeny, and evolutionary pace within the heterocystous cyanobacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.