Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25226500›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2014

Pediatric severe sepsis: current trends and outcomes from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database.

Amanda Ruth, Courtney E McCracken, James D Fortenberry, Matthew Hall, Harold K Simon, Kiran B Hebbar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Continuous Hemodynamic Response to Angiotensin II in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: A Single Center Cohort Study.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda Ruth1Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 2Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 3Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA. 4Children's Hospital Association, Kansas City, MO.
Courtney E McCracken
James D Fortenberry
Matthew Hall
Harold K Simon
Kiran B Hebbar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo 1) describe the characteristics and outcomes over time of PICU patients with severe sepsis within the dedicated U.S. children's hospitals, 2) identify patient subgroups at risk for mortality from pediatric severe sepsis, and 3) describe overall pediatric severe sepsis resource utilization.

designRetrospective review of a prospectively collected multi-institutional children's hospital database.

settingPICUs in 43 U.S. children's hospitals. PATIENTS: PICU patients from birth to younger than 19 years were identified with severe sepsis by modified Angus criteria and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes for severe sepsis and septic shock.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsData from the Pediatric Health Information System database collected by the Children's Hospital Association from 2004 to 2012. Pediatric severe sepsis was defined by 1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes reflecting severe sepsis and septic shock and 2) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes of infection and organ dysfunction as defined by modified Angus criteria. From 2004 to 2012, 636,842 patients were identified from 43 hospitals. Pediatric severe sepsis prevalence was 7.7% (49,153) with an associated mortality rate of 14.4%. Age less than 1 year (vs age 10 to < 19) (odds ratio, 1.4), underlying cardiovascular condition (odds ratio, 1.4) and multiple organ dysfunction, conferred higher odds of mortality. Resource burden was significant with median hospital length of stay of 17 days (interquartile range, 8-36 d) and PICU length of stay of 7 days (interquartile range, 2-17 d), with median cost/day of $4,516 and median total hospitalization cost of $77,446. There was a significant increase in the severe sepsis prevalence rate from 6.2% to 7.7% from 2004 to 2012 (p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in mortality from 18.9% to 12.0% (p < 0.001). Center mortality was negatively correlated with prevalence (rs = -0.48) and volume (rs = -0.39) and positively correlated with cost (rs = 0.36).

conclusionsIn this largest reported pediatric severe sepsis cohort to date, prevalence increased from 2004 to 2012 while associated mortality decreased. Age, cardiovascular comorbidity, and organ dysfunction were significant prognostic factors. Pediatric severe sepsis remains an important cause for PICU admission and mortality and leads to a substantial burden in healthcare costs. Individual center's prevalence and volume are associated with improved outcomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrevalenceRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.