Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25226075›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Combination therapy with antibiotics and anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIGIV) is potentially more effective than antibiotics alone in rabbit model of inhalational anthrax.

Srinivas Kammanadiminti, Ravi Kumar Patnaikuni, Jason Comer, Gabriel Meister, Chris Sinclair, Shantha Kodihalli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bacillus anthracis Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Animal Models, 1947-2019.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Pre- and Postlicensure Animal Efficacy Studies Comparing Anthrax Antitoxins.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ACS infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Srinivas KammanadimintiDepartment of Clinical Research, Cangene Corporation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Ravi Kumar PatnaikuniDepartment of Clinical Research, Cangene Corporation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jason ComerBattelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Gabriel MeisterBattelle Biomedical Research Center, West Jefferson, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Chris SinclairDepartment of Clinical Research, Cangene Corporation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Shantha KodihalliDepartment of Clinical Research, Cangene Corporation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Research Manitoba · CABattelle · US

Funding

PHS HHS HHSO100200500007C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of AIGIV when given in combination with levofloxacin and the effective window of treatment to assess the added benefit provided by AIGIV over standard antibiotic treatment alone in a New Zealand white rabbit model of inhalational anthrax.

methodsRabbits were exposed to lethal dose of aerosolized spores of Bacillus anthracis (Ames strain) and treated intravenously with either placebo, (normal immune globulin intravenous, IGIV) or 15 U/kg of AIGIV, along with oral levofloxacin treatment at various time points (30-96 hours) after anthrax exposure.

resultsThe majority of treated animals (>88%) survived in both treatment groups when treatment was initiated within 60 hours of post-exposure. However, reduced survival of 55%, 33% and 25% was observed for placebo + levofloxacin group when the treatment was initiated at 72, 84 and 96 hours post-exposure, respectively. Conversely, a survival rate of 65%, 40% and 71% was observed in the AIGIV + levofloxacin treated groups at these time points.

conclusionsThe combination of AIGIV with antibiotics provided an improvement in survival compared to levofloxacin treatment alone when treatment was delayed up to 96 hours post-anthrax exposure. Additionally, AIGIV treatment when given as an adjunct therapy at any of the time points tested did not interfere with the efficacy of levofloxacin.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthraxAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisBacteremiaDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleImmunoglobulins, IntravenousLevofloxacinMaleRabbitsRespiratory Tract InfectionsToxemiaTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialImmunoglobulins, IntravenousLevofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID25226075
PMCPMC4165586
OpenAlexW2021161428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.