Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25226030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Antioxidants maintain E-cadherin levels to limit Drosophila prohemocyte differentiation.

Hongjuan Gao, Xiaorong Wu, LaTonya Simon, Nancy Fossett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peeling Back the Layers of Lymph Gland Structure and Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mitochondrial Control of Stem Cell State and Fate: Lessons FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongjuan GaoCenter for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases and the Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Xiaorong WuCenter for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases and the Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
LaTonya SimonDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Nancy FossettCenter for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases and the Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

Genetic Regulation of Drosophila HematopoiesisR01DK072229 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FOSSETT, NANCY G · 2005 to 2014
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072229PHS HHS NIDDK 07229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulate a variety of biological processes by networking with signal transduction pathways to maintain homeostasis and support adaptation to stress. In this capacity, ROS have been shown to promote the differentiation of progenitor cells, including mammalian embryonic and hematopoietic stem cells and Drosophila hematopoietic progenitors (prohemocytes). However, many questions remain about how ROS alter the regulatory machinery to promote progenitor differentiation. Here, we provide evidence for the hypothesis that ROS reduce E-cadherin levels to promote Drosophila prohemocyte differentiation. Specifically, we show that knockdown of the antioxidants, Superoxide dismutatase 2 and Catalase reduce E-cadherin protein levels prior to the loss of Odd-skipped-expressing prohemocytes. Additionally, over-expression of E-cadherin limits prohemocyte differentiation resulting from paraquat-induced oxidative stress. Furthermore, two established targets of ROS, Enhancer of Polycomb and FOS, control the level of E-cadherin protein expression. Finally, we show that knockdown of either Superoxide dismutatase 2 or Catalase leads to an increase in the E-cadherin repressor, Serpent. As a result, antioxidants and targets of ROS can control E-cadherin protein levels, and over-expression of E-cadherin can ameliorate the prohemocyte response to oxidative stress. Collectively, these data strongly suggest that ROS promote differentiation by reducing E-cadherin levels. In mammalian systems, ROS promote embryonic stem cell differentiation, whereas E-cadherin blocks differentiation. However, it is not known if elevated ROS reduce E-cadherin to promote embryonic stem cell differentiation. Thus, our findings may have identified an important mechanism by which ROS promote stem/progenitor cell differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsCadherinsCatalaseCell DifferentiationDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFree Radical ScavengersGATA Transcription FactorsGene Expression RegulationGene Knockdown TechniquesHematopoietic Stem CellsHemocytesJNK Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxide DismutaseAntioxidantsCadherinsCatalaseDrosophila ProteinsFree Radical ScavengersGATA Transcription FactorsJNK Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesReactive Oxygen Speciessrp protein, DrosophilaSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase 2

Identifiers

PMID25226030
PMCPMC4167200
OpenAlexW2007421764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.