ReviewQuarterly reviews of biophysics2014
Frustration in biomolecules.
Review in Quarterly reviews of biophysics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
171 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From static structures to dynamic energy landscapes: the latest revolution in molecular biology.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Sequence-Encoded Frustration Directs the Formation of Abridged G-Quadruplex Architectures.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- amyloid-predict and LLPS-predict: Predicting phase separation propensities in the intrinsically disordered proteome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Screening for novel chemical scaffolds targeting PCNA identifies the Hsp90alpha inhibitor SNX-2112.Current research in structural biology · 2026Article
- Decoupling Size from Shape: Cellular Sheaf Laplacians as Ligand Geometry Descriptors for Binding Affinity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Chirobiophore: A Novel Framework for Quantifying Biochirality in Macromolecular Systems.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- An information-theoretic argument for the restriction of the current biological alphabets to 4 nucleotides and 20 amino acids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cancer-associated TRF1 mutations alter PARP1 interaction dynamics: an in silico study.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- AF2BIND: predicting small-molecule binding sites using the pair representation of AlphaFold2.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Novel Rapid In Situ Curable PEGDA/PEG Composite Hydrogel Drives Biological Closure of Aneurysm Neck.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Predicting Protein Folding Dynamics Using Sequence Information.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Untangling the Complexity of Binding Across Biomolecular Interfaces with Interaction Network Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Binding Specificity and Local Frustration in Structure-based Drug Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Viscoelasticity and interface properties of multi-component condensates govern protein sequestration and suppression of amyloid formation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mapping the energy landscape of a fold-switching protein MAD2.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Article
- Sequence-based calculation of local energetic frustration in proteins.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Role of frustrations in cell reprogramming.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecules are the prime information processing elements of living matter. Most of these inanimate systems are polymers that compute their own structures and dynamics using as input seemingly random character strings of their sequence, following which they coalesce and perform integrated cellular functions. In large computational systems with finite interaction-codes, the appearance of conflicting goals is inevitable. Simple conflicting forces can lead to quite complex structures and behaviors, leading to the concept of frustration in condensed matter. We present here some basic ideas about frustration in biomolecules and how the frustration concept leads to a better appreciation of many aspects of the architecture of biomolecules, and especially how biomolecular structure connects to function by means of localized frustration. These ideas are simultaneously both seductively simple and perilously subtle to grasp completely. The energy landscape theory of protein folding provides a framework for quantifying frustration in large systems and has been implemented at many levels of description. We first review the notion of frustration from the areas of abstract logic and its uses in simple condensed matter systems. We discuss then how the frustration concept applies specifically to heteropolymers, testing folding landscape theory in computer simulations of protein models and in experimentally accessible systems. Studying the aspects of frustration averaged over many proteins provides ways to infer energy functions useful for reliable structure prediction. We discuss how frustration affects folding mechanisms. We review here how the biological functions of proteins are related to subtle local physical frustration effects and how frustration influences the appearance of metastable states, the nature of binding processes, catalysis and allosteric transitions. In this review, we also emphasize that frustration, far from being always a bad thing, is an essential feature of biomolecules that allows dynamics to be harnessed for function. In this way, we hope to illustrate how Frustration is a fundamental concept in molecular biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.