ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2014
Myositis registries and biorepositories: powerful tools to advance clinical, epidemiologic and pathogenic research.
Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Juvenile Myositis: Insights on Classification, Pathogenesis, and Therapies Over the Past 50 Years.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
- Biorepositories For Global Rare Disease Research: A Narrative Review.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
- Long Term Outcomes in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis: An Observational Epidemiologic Study over 15 Years.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Baseline characteristics of children with juvenile dermatomyositis enrolled in the first year of the new Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance registry.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2022Article
- B Cells as a Therapeutic Target in Paediatric Rheumatic Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Risk factors and disease mechanisms in myositis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018Review
- Development of a consensus core dataset in juvenile dermatomyositis for clinical use to inform research.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2018Article
- The EuroMyositis registry: an international collaborative tool to facilitate myositis research.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2018Article
- Predictors of Reduced Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.Arthritis care & research · 2017Article
- The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathogenesis, clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, and outcomes.Journal of internal medicine · 2016Review
- Inflammatory myopathy: diagnosis and clinical course, specific clinical scenarios and new complementary tools.Expert review of clinical immunology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewClinical registries and biorepositories have proven extremely useful in many studies of diseases, especially rare diseases. Given their rarity and diversity, the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or myositis syndromes, have benefited from individual researchers' collections of cohorts of patients. Major efforts are being made to establish large registries and biorepositories that will allow many additional studies to be performed that were not possible before. Here, we describe the registries developed by investigators and patient support groups that are currently available for collaborative research purposes. RECENT
findingsWe have identified 46 myositis research registries, including many with biorepositories, which have been developed for a wide variety of purposes and have resulted in great advances in understanding the range of phenotypes, clinical presentations, risk factors, pathogenic mechanisms, outcome assessment, therapeutic responses, and prognoses. These are now available for collaborative use to undertake additional studies. Two myositis patient registries have been developed for research, and myositis patient support groups maintain demographic registries with large numbers of patients available to be contacted for potential research participation. SUMMARY: Investigator-initiated myositis research registries and biorepositories have proven extremely useful in understanding many aspects of these rare and diverse autoimmune diseases. These registries and biorepositories, in addition to those developed by myositis patient support groups, deserve continued support to maintain the momentum in this field as they offer major opportunities to improve understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of these diseases in cost-effective ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.