Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25225822›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

A proboscis extension response protocol for investigating behavioral plasticity in insects: application to basic, biomedical, and agricultural research.

Brian H Smith, Christina M Burden

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reinforcement expectation in the honeybee (Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tyramine and itseLife · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proboscis behavioral response of four honey beeSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian H SmithSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University; BrianHSmith@asu.edu.
Christina M BurdenSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF OLFACTIONR01RR014166 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, BRIAN H. · 1998 to 2009
$3.0M
CRCNS: Dyanamic and Distributed Memory in OlfactionR01DC011422 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HUERTA, RAMON · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR014166NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects modify their responses to stimuli through experience of associating those stimuli with events important for survival (e.g., food, mates, threats). There are several behavioral mechanisms through which an insect learns salient associations and relates them to these events. It is important to understand this behavioral plasticity for programs aimed toward assisting insects that are beneficial for agriculture. This understanding can also be used for discovering solutions to biomedical and agricultural problems created by insects that act as disease vectors and pests. The Proboscis Extension Response (PER) conditioning protocol was developed for honey bees (Apis mellifera) over 50 years ago to study how they perceive and learn about floral odors, which signal the nectar and pollen resources a colony needs for survival. The PER procedure provides a robust and easy-to-employ framework for studying several different ecologically relevant mechanisms of behavioral plasticity. It is easily adaptable for use with several other insect species and other behavioral reflexes. These protocols can be readily employed in conjunction with various means for monitoring neural activity in the CNS via electrophysiology or bioimaging, or for manipulating targeted neuromodulatory pathways. It is a robust assay for rapidly detecting sub-lethal effects on behavior caused by environmental stressors, toxins or pesticides. We show how the PER protocol is straightforward to implement using two procedures. One is suitable as a laboratory exercise for students or for quick assays of the effect of an experimental treatment. The other provides more thorough control of variables, which is important for studies of behavioral conditioning. We show how several measures for the behavioral response ranging from binary yes/no to more continuous variable like latency and duration of proboscis extension can be used to test hypotheses. And, we discuss some pitfalls that researchers commonly encounter when they use the procedure for the first time.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantLearning

Identifiers

PMID25225822
PMCPMC4828057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.