ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2014
BRIGHT Guidelines on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Iranian Consensus on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: An Expert Consensus.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Optimized health care for subjects with type 1 diabetes in a resource constraint society: A three-year follow-up study from Pakistan.World journal of diabetes · 2019Article
- Current management strategies to target the increasing incidence of diabetes within Pakistan.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019Review
- Association of Diabetic Neuropathy with Duration of Type 2 Diabetes and Glycemic Control.Cureus · 2015Article
- Pakistan's Recommendations for Optimal Management of diabetes from Primary to Tertiary care level (PROMPT).Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pakistan, a developing country with limited resources, is having huge burden of diabetes and its complications. The local health care providers face limitations due to the related cost while emphasizing on self monitoring of blood glucose. The lack of health care infrastructure, non-affordability of the patients and non-existence of national guidelines are the most significant obstacles. Having realized these issues we decided to initiate a project of self monitoring of blood glucose, "BRIGHT (Better Recommendations, Implementation and Guideline development for Health care providers and their Training). After extensive literature search, the project team, approached and communicated with "Advisory Board for the Care of Diabetes (ABCD) of Pakistan" for their expert opinion and suggestions. The board members belong to the faculty of main teaching hospitals of the four provinces of Pakistan thus ensuring national representation. The endorsement of these guidelines has paved the way for their uniform implementation all over the country. Development of these Guidelines is the first part of BRIGHT project. In the next phase, we have started training of health care providers. Five mega programs have been conducted in this regard in the major cities. So far a patient's log book has also been designed and distributed. Like all other guidelines, this is a living document which will be revised and updated from time to time in the light of new information which becomes available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.