ArticleNeurocomputing2014
A Learning Based Fiducial-driven Registration Scheme for Evaluating Laser Ablation Changes in Neurological Disorders.
Article in Neurocomputing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive modeling of brain tumor laser ablation dynamics.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Scalable Joint Segmentation and Registration Framework for Infant Brain Images.Neurocomputing · 2017Article
- Association of computerized texture features on MRI with early treatment response following laser ablation for neuropathic cancer pain: preliminary findings.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2015Article
- Identifying MRI markers to evaluate early treatment related changes post laser ablation for cancer pain management.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we present a novel learning based fiducial driven registration (LeFiR) scheme which utilizes a point matching technique to identify the optimal configuration of landmarks to better recover deformation between a target and a moving image. Moreover, we employ the LeFiR scheme to model the localized nature of deformation introduced by a new treatment modality - laser induced interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for treating neurological disorders. Magnetic resonance (MR) guided LITT has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to craniotomy for local treatment of brain diseases (such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), epilepsy). However, LITT is currently only practised as an investigational procedure world-wide due to lack of data on longer term patient outcome following LITT. There is thus a need to quantitatively evaluate treatment related changes between post- and pre-LITT in terms of MR imaging markers. In order to validate LeFiR, we tested the scheme on a synthetic brain dataset (SBD) and in two real clinical scenarios for treating GBM and epilepsy with LITT. Four experiments under different deformation profiles simulating localized ablation effects of LITT on MRI were conducted on 286 pairs of SBD images. The training landmark configurations were obtained through 2000 iterations of registration where the points with consistently best registration performance were selected. The estimated landmarks greatly improved the quality metrics compared to a uniform grid (UniG) placement scheme, a speeded-up robust features (SURF) based method, and a scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) based method as well as a generic free-form deformation (FFD) approach. The LeFiR method achieved average 90% improvement in recovering the local deformation compared to 82% for the uniform grid placement, 62% for the SURF based approach, and 16% for the generic FFD approach. On the real GBM and epilepsy data, the quantitative results showed that LeFiR outperformed UniG by 28% improvement in average.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.