Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25225002›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2014

Mapping mean axon diameter and axonal volume fraction by MRI using temporal diffusion spectroscopy.

Junzhong Xu, Hua Li, Kevin D Harkins, Xiaoyu Jiang, Jingping Xie, Hakmook Kang, Mark D Does, John C Gore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junzhong XuInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: junzhong.xu@vanderbilt.edu.
Hua LiInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Kevin D HarkinsInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Xiaoyu JiangInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Jingping XieInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Hakmook KangDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Mark D DoesInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
John C GoreInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Vanderbilt In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging CenterP50CA128323 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PHAM, WELLINGTON · 2008 to 2012
$6.8M
MRI Diffusion in Tumors Using Oscillating GradientsR01CA109106 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI XU, JUNZHONG · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
Sub-Voxel Tissue Characterization With In-Vivo MRIR01EB001744 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DOES, MARK D · 2003 to 2014
$3.3M
Comprehensive Evaluation of OGSE DWI for Assessing Tumor Treatment ResponseR01CA173593 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
Assessment of Tumor Early Response to Treatment by Diffusion MRIK25CA168936 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI XU, JUNZHONG · 2013 to 2017
$728k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA168936NCI NIH HHS K25CA168936NCI NIH HHS P50 CA128323NCI NIH HHS P50CA128323NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109106NCI NIH HHS R01CA109106NCI NIH HHS R01 CA173593NCI NIH HHS R01CA173593NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001744NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB001744NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mapping mean axon diameter and intra-axonal volume fraction may have significant clinical potential because nerve conduction velocity is directly dependent on axon diameter, and several neurodegenerative diseases affect axons of specific sizes and alter axon counts. Diffusion-weighted MRI methods based on the pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) sequence have been reported to be able to assess axon diameter and volume fraction non-invasively. However, due to the relatively long diffusion times used, e.g. >20ms, the sensitivity to small axons (diameter<2μm) is low, and the derived mean axon diameter has been reported to be overestimated. In the current study, oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) diffusion sequences with variable frequency gradients were used to assess rat spinal white matter tracts with relatively short effective diffusion times (1-5ms). In contrast to previous PGSE-based methods, the extra-axonal diffusion cannot be modeled as hindered (Gaussian) diffusion when short diffusion times are used. Appropriate frequency-dependent rates are therefore incorporated into our analysis and validated by histology-based computer simulation of water diffusion. OGSE data were analyzed to derive mean axon diameters and intra-axonal volume fractions of rat spinal white matter tracts (mean axon diameter of ~1.27-5.54μm). The estimated values were in good agreement with histology, including the small axon diameters (<2.5μm). This study establishes a framework for the quantification of nerve morphology using the OGSE method with high sensitivity to small axons.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsComputer SimulationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpectrum AnalysisSpinal CordWhite MatterAxon diameterDiffusionDiffusion timeMRIOscillating gradientVolume fraction

Identifiers

PMID25225002
PMCPMC4312203
OpenAlexW2085530397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.