Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25224929›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2015

Add-on anticholinergic therapy for residual nocturia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms receiving α1-blocker treatment: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised study.

Osamu Yokoyama, Akira Tsujimura, Hironobu Akino, Naoki Segawa, Satoshi Tamada, Naoki Oguchi, Yasuhide Kitagawa, Hidenori Tsuji, Akihiko Watanabe, Teruo Inamoto and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Bipolar radiofrequency thermotherapy vs. transurethral resection of the prostate: Effect on nocturia as a result of benign prostatic obstruction.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nocturia: aetiology and treatment in adults.Nature reviews. Urology · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Osamu YokoyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan, oyoko@u-fukui.ac.jp.
Akira Tsujimura
Hironobu Akino
Naoki Segawa
Satoshi Tamada
Naoki Oguchi
Yasuhide Kitagawa
Hidenori Tsuji
Akihiko Watanabe
Teruo Inamoto
Nobutaka Shimizu
Yasuyoshi Fujiuchi
Yoji Katsuoka
Haruhito Azuma
Tadashi Matsuda
Mikio Namiki
Hirotsugu Uemura
Akihiko Okuyama
Norio Nonomura
Hideki Fuse
Tatsuya Nakatani
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPKindai University · JPOsaka University · JPUniversity of Toyama · JPKanazawa University · JPKansai Medical University · JPOsaka City University · JPUniversity of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of imidafenacin (IM), a novel short half-life anticholinergic, as add-on therapy for male LUTS with nocturia and nocturnal polyuria. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-labelled study was conducted and involved men who had frequency, urgency, and nocturia despite receiving a stable dose of α1-blocker for ≥1 month. Subjects were randomised to control (α1-blocker alone), IM twice/day (α1-blocker +0.1 mg imidafenacin twice daily), or IM nightly (α1-blocker plus 0.1 mg imidafenacin nightly) group; the treatment period was 8 weeks. Primary endpoints included improvements in night-time frequency and Nocturia Quality of Life Questionnaire (N-QOL) scores. Secondary endpoints included changes from the baseline in frequency volume chart variables, and post-void residual volume. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with the controls, IM twice/day and IM nightly patients had a significantly lower night-time frequency (changes from baseline: 0.1 ± 0.8 in control, -0.6 ± 0.9 in IM twice/day, and -0.4 ± 1.0 in IM nightly, p = 0.5227, 0.0006 and 0.0143, respectively). The hours of undisturbed sleep and N-QOL score were significantly improved in IM twice/day group, though not IM nightly group. Nocturnal urine volume was significantly reduced in IM nightly group, although total urine volume remained unchanged.

conclusionsA short half-life anticholinergic is suggested to be safe and effective as an add-on therapy for residual nocturia in patients with male LUTS receiving α1-blocker treatment. Anticholinergic administration nightly could reduce the nocturnal urine volume.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overCholinergic AntagonistsDrug Therapy, CombinationHalf-LifeHumansImidazolesIncidenceJapanLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMaleNocturiaProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsCholinergic AntagonistsimidafenacinImidazoles

Identifiers

PMID25224929
PMCPMC4555202
OpenAlexW1973536706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.