Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25224618›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2014

Engaging male partners in women's microbicide use: evidence from clinical trials and implications for future research and microbicide introduction.

Michele Lanham, Rose Wilcher, Elizabeth T Montgomery, Robert Pool, Sidney Schuler, Rachel Lenzi, Barbara Friedland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele LanhamSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA; mlanham@fhi360.org.
Rose WilcherResearch Utilization, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Elizabeth T MontgomeryWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco Project Office, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robert PoolCentre for Social Science and Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sidney SchulerSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Rachel LenziSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Barbara FriedlandHIV and AIDS Program, Population Council, New York, NY, USA.
Family Health International 360 · USPopulation Council · USRTI International · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Medical Research Council G0100137Medical Research Council MC_U122861322Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/1NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConstructively engaging male partners in women-centred health programs such as family planning and prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission has resulted in both improved health outcomes and stronger relationships. Concerted efforts to engage men in microbicide use could make it easier for women to access and use microbicides in the future. This paper synthesizes findings from studies that investigated men's role in their partners' microbicide use during clinical trials to inform recommendations for male engagement in women's microbicide use.

methodsWe conducted primary and secondary analyses of data from six qualitative studies implemented in conjunction with microbicide clinical trials in South Africa, Kenya, and Tanzania. The analyses included data from 535 interviews and 107 focus groups with trial participants, male partners, and community members to answer research questions on partner communication about microbicides, men's role in women's microbicide use, and potential strategies for engaging men in future microbicide introduction. We synthesized the findings across the studies and developed recommendations.

resultsThe majority of women in steady partnerships wanted agreement from their partners to use microbicides. Women used various strategies to obtain their agreement, including using the product for a while before telling their partners, giving men information gradually, and continuing to bring up microbicides until resistant partners acquiesced. Among men who were aware their partners were participating in a trial and using microbicides, involvement ranged from opposition to agreement/non-interference to active support. Both men and women expressed a desire for men to have access to information about microbicides and to be able to talk with a healthcare provider about microbicides.

conclusionsWe recommend counselling women on whether and how to involve their partners including strategies for gaining partner approval; providing couples' counselling on microbicides so men have the opportunity to talk with providers; and targeting men with community education and mass media to increase their awareness and acceptance of microbicides. These strategies should be tested in microbicide trials, open-label studies, and demonstration projects to identify effective male engagement approaches to include in eventual microbicide introduction. Efforts to engage men must take care not to diminish women's agency to decide whether to use the product and inform their partners.

Indexed as

Drug UtilizationAdministration, IntravaginalAdultAnti-Infective AgentsDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHealth EducationHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicKenyaMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSexual PartnersSouth AfricaTanzaniaAnti-Infective Agentsgender relationsHIVMicrobicidespartner communicationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID25224618
PMCPMC4163996
OpenAlexW2002434603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.