Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25224617›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2014

An interdisciplinary framework for measuring and supporting adherence in HIV prevention trials of ARV-based vaginal rings.

Kathleen M MacQueen, Elizabeth E Tolley, Derek H Owen, K Rivet Amico, Kathleen M Morrow, Thomas Moench, David R Friend, Barbara Friedland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Women and ARV-based HIV prevention - challenges and opportunities.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathleen M MacQueenSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA; kmacqueen@fhi360.org.
Elizabeth E TolleySocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Derek H OwenContraceptive Technology Institute, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
K Rivet AmicoDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kathleen M MorrowCenters for Behavioral & Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Thomas MoenchReprotect Inc, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David R FriendProduct Development, CONRAD, Arlington, VA, USA.
Barbara FriedlandPopulation Council, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProduct adherence and its measurement have emerged as a critical challenge in the evaluation of new HIV prevention technologies. Long-acting ARV-based vaginal rings may simplify use instructions and require less user behaviour, thereby facilitating adherence. One ARV-based ring is in efficacy trials and others, including multipurpose rings, are in the pipeline. Participant motivations, counselling support and measurement challenges during ring trials must still be addressed. In previous HIV prevention trials, this has been done largely using descriptive and post-hoc methods that are highly variable and minimally evaluated. We outline an interdisciplinary framework for systematically investigating promising strategies to support product uptake and adherence, and to measure adherence in the context of randomized, blinded clinical trials. DISCUSSION: The interdisciplinary framework highlights the dual use of adherence measurement (i.e. to provide feedback during trial implementation and to inform interpretation of trial findings) and underscores the complex pathways that connect measurement, adherence support and enacted adherence behaviour. Three inter-related approaches are highlighted: 1) adherence support - sequential efforts to define motivators of study product adherence and to develop, test, refine and evaluate adherence support messages; 2) self-reported psychometric measures - creation of valid and generalizable measures based in easily administered scales that capture vaginal ring use with improved predictive ability at screening, baseline and follow-up that better engage participants in reporting adherence; and 3) more objective measurement of adherence - real-time adherence monitoring and cumulative measurement to correlate adherence with overall product effectiveness through innovative designs, models and prototypes using electronic and biometric technologies to detect ring insertion and/or removal or expulsion. Coordinating research along these three pathways will result in a comprehensive approach to product adherence within clinical trials.

conclusionsBetter measurement of adherence will not, by itself, ensure that future effectiveness trials will be able to address the most basic question: if the product is used per instructions, will it prevent HIV transmission? The challenges to adherence measurement must be addressed as one component of a more integrated system that has as its central focus adherence as a behaviour emerging from the social context of the user.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemaleMedication AdherenceAnti-Retroviral AgentsChemopreventionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPre-Exposure ProphylaxisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Retroviral Agentsacceptabilityadherenceclinical trial researchHIV preventionmeasurementvaginal ring

Identifiers

PMID25224617
PMCPMC4164000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.