Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25224611›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2014

Comparing patterns of sexual risk among adolescent and young women in a mixed-method study in Tanzania: implications for adolescent participation in HIV prevention trials.

Elizabeth E Tolley, Sylvia Kaaya, Anna Kaale, Anna Minja, Doreen Bangapi, Happy Kalungura, Jennifer Headley, Joy Noel Baumgartner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Women and ARV-based HIV prevention - challenges and opportunities.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth E TolleySocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA; btolley@fhi360.org.
Sylvia KaayaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Services, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anna KaaleMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Services, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anna MinjaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Services, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Doreen BangapiMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Services, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Happy KalunguraMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Services, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jennifer HeadleySocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Joy Noel BaumgartnerSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Adolescent Women & microbicide Trials: Assessing the Challenges and OpportunitiesR01MH086160 · NIMH · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI TOLLEY, ELIZABETH ELLEN · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the disproportionate impact of HIV on women, and adolescents in particular, those below age 18 years are underrepresented in HIV prevention trials due to ethical, safety and logistical concerns. This study examined and compared the sexual risk contexts of adolescent women aged 15-17 to young adult women aged 18-21 to determine whether adolescents exhibited similar risk profiles and the implications for their inclusion in future trials.

methodsWe conducted a two-phase, mixed-method study to assess the opportunities and challenges of recruiting and retaining adolescents (aged 15-17) versus young women (18-21) in Tanzania. Phase I, community formative research (CFR), used serial in-depth interviews with 11 adolescent and 12 young adult women from a range of sexual risk contexts in preparation for a mock clinical trial (MCT). For Phase II, 135 HIV-negative, non-pregnant adolescents and young women were enrolled into a six-month MCT to assess and compare differences in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, including risky sexual behaviour, incident pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and HIV.

resultsIn both research phases, adolescents appeared to be at similar, if not higher, risk than their young adult counterparts. Adolescents reported earlier sexual debut, and similar numbers of lifetime partners, pregnancy and STI/RTI rates, yet had lower perceived risk. Married women in the CFR appeared at particular risk but were less represented in the MCT. In addition, adolescents were less likely than their older counterparts to have accessed HIV testing, obtained gynaecological exams or used protective technologies.

conclusionsAdolescent women under 18 are at risk of multiple negative SRH outcomes and they underuse preventive services. Their access to new technologies such as vaginal microbicides or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may similarly be compromised unless greater effort is made to include them in clinical trial research.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorAdolescentFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRisk AssessmentSexually Transmitted DiseasesTanzaniaYoung Adultadolescentsclinical trials researchHIV preventionsexual and reproductive healthTanzania

Identifiers

PMID25224611
PMCPMC4163993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.