Trial reportPatient education and counseling2014
Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.
Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05825040 (Randomized Controlled Trial on Precision Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial on Precision Mental Health
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Cultural adaptations to augment health and mental health services: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2017Pooled it
- Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Trial
- Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.Health education research · 2022Trial
- Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of Message Frame-Tailoring in a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Race moderates the effects of Motivational Interviewing on smoking cessation induction.Patient education and counseling · 2020Trial
- Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018Trial
- Correlates of Integrated Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening Protection in U.S. Low-Income Women.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Article
- Message Frame-Tailoring in Digital Health Communication: Intervention Redesign and Usability Testing.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- The Relationship between Future Anxiety Due to COVID-19 and Vigilance: The Role of Message Fatigue and Autonomy Satisfaction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Identifying the Most Autonomy-Supportive Message Frame in Digital Health Communication: A 2x2 Between-Subjects Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Colorectal Cancer Decision Aid Using a Centralized Delivery Strategy.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2018Article
- Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making.Patient education and counseling · 2017Article
- Correlates of Health Communication Preferences in a Multiethnic Population of Pregnant Women and Mothers of Young Children.Journal of health education research & development · 2016Article
- Article
- Customization in mobile health apps: explaining effects on physical activity intentions by the need for autonomy.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTest the impact of tailoring CRC screening messages for African Americans (AAs) using novel theoretical variables and to examine moderating effect of communication preferences.
methodsParticipants were randomized to receive two minimally tailored or two enhanced tailored print newsletters addressing CRC. The enhanced intervention was tailored on Self-Determination Theory and other novel psychological constructs. Minimal tailoring only used information available in the patient's EHR. The primary outcome was CRC screening based on EHR. Participants were AA members aged 50-74 of an integrated health care delivery system not up to date on CRC screening.
resultsWe enrolled 881 participants. CRC screening participation rates at 1-year follow up were 20.5% and 21.5% in the minimally and enhanced tailored groups, respectively. Communication preferences moderated the impact of the intervention. Specifically, among those with an autonomous communication preference, screening rates in the minimally and enhanced tailored groups were 17.1% and 25.9%, respectively, while no intervention effect was evident among those with a directive preference.
conclusionFuture research is needed to explore the impact of communication preference tailoring for other health behaviors and among other populations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Tailored communications should consider communication style preference to help guide the content and tone of messages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.