ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014
In vivo efficacy of humanized exposures of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in comparison with Ceftazidime against contemporary Enterobacteriaceae isolates.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological aspects and spectrum of action of ceftazidime-avibactam: a systematic review.Infection · 2018Pooled it
- Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Trial
- Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime/avibactam in a neurocritical patient with CRKP intracranial infection and augmented renal clearance.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Impact of iron limitation on in vitro and in vivo activity of ceftazidime against A. baumannii.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Polymyxins retainAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Assessing the in vivo efficacy of rational antibiotics and combinations against difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing GES β-lactamases.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2023Article
- Neutralizing Carbapenem Resistance by Co-Administering Meropenem with Novel β-Lactam-Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitors.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Efficacy of ceftazidime in a murine model following a lethal aerosol exposure to Burkholderia pseudomallei.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment of Ceftazidime in Adult Patients on General Wards with Different Degrees of Renal Function: A Prospective Observational Bicenter Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In vivo translational assessment of the GES genotype on the killing profile of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Phenotypic/Genotypic Profile of OXA-10-Like-Harboring, Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Using Validated Pharmacokinetic/PharmacodynamicAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- The Ongoing Challenge with NDM-HarboringAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- [Chinese guidelines for the clinical application of antibacterial drugs for agranulocytosis with fever (2020)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2020Article
- Virtual screening identifies broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors with activity on clinically relevant serine- and metallo-carbapenemases.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Human-Simulated Antimicrobial Regimens in Animal Models: Transparency and Validation Are Imperative.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- New cephalosporins for the treatment of pneumonia in internal medicine wards.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults (2018 Edition).Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
- The Epidemiology, Evolution, and Treatment of KPC-Producing Organisms.Current infectious disease reports · 2018Review
- Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018Review
- Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Review in the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.Drugs · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceftazidime-avibactam is a β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination under investigation for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. When combined with avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, ceftazidime has activity against isolates that produce Ambler class A, class C, and some class D β-lactamases. However, little is known of the in vivo efficacy of the combination against these targeted ceftazidime- and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Using humanized exposures in the murine thigh model, we evaluated the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae exhibiting MICs of ≥8 μg/ml to aid in the assignment of interpretive susceptibility criteria. Eighteen clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates, including nine carbapenem-resistant strains, were evaluated against ceftazidime-avibactam (2,000 mg/500 mg) as a 2-h infusion every 8 h. To highlight the impact of avibactam, 13 select isolates were tested in the neutropenic model against a humanized regimen of 2,000 mg ceftazidime every 8 h (2-h infusion). Additionally, nine isolates were evaluated in immunocompetent animals. The efficacy was evaluated as the change in log10 CFU compared with that of 0-h controls after 24 h. The vast majority (17/18, 94%) of the isolates were resistant to ceftazidime alone. The ceftazidime monotherapy failed to have activity against 10 of 13 isolates, while ceftazidime-avibactam produced reductions in bacterial density against 16 of 18 isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam (2,000 mg/500 mg) every 8 h (2-h infusion) displayed dependable activity against the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, exhibiting MICs of ≤16 μg/ml (free drug concentration above the MIC [fT>MIC] of ≥62%) and variable activity was noted at an MIC of 32 μg/ml (fT>MIC of 34%). The presence of a functioning immune system enhanced the efficacy for both regimens against all tested isolates. These data support further examination of the use of ceftazidime-avibactam as an effective therapy against infections due to Gram-negative infections, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.