Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25223712›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2014

The potential influence of morphology on the evolutionary divergence of an acoustic signal.

W R Pitchers, C P Klingenberg, T Tregenza, J Hunt, I Dworkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W R PitchersDepartment of Zoology, Program in Ecology Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, UK.
C P Klingenberg
T Tregenza
J Hunt
I Dworkin

Funding

Building, understanding and applying a dictionary of genetic effectsR01GM094424 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DWORKIN, IAN MICHAEL, HOULE, DAVID · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM094424-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of acoustic behaviour and that of the morphological traits mediating its production are often coupled. Lack of variation in the underlying morphology of signalling traits has the potential to constrain signal evolution. This relationship is particularly likely in field crickets, where males produce acoustic advertisement signals to attract females by stridulating with specialized structures on their forewings. In this study, we characterize the size and geometric shape of the forewings of males from six allopatric populations of the black field cricket (Teleogryllus commodus) known to have divergent advertisement calls. We sample from each of these populations using both wild-caught and common-garden-reared cohorts, allowing us to test for multivariate relationships between wing morphology and call structure. We show that the allometry of shape has diverged across populations. However, there was a surprisingly small amount of covariation between wing shape and call structure within populations. Given the importance of male size for sexual selection in crickets, the divergence we observe among populations has the potential to influence the evolution of advertisement calls in this species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsGenetics, PopulationGryllidaeMalePhenotypeWings, Animaladvertisement callcommon gardenfield cricketgeometric morphometricssexual selection

Identifiers

PMID25223712
PMCPMC4199928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.