Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25223394›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationship of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis.

David Ternant, Emilie Ducourau, Piéra Fuzibet, Céline Vignault, Hervé Watier, Thierry Lequerré, Xavier Le Loët, Olivier Vittecoq, Philippe Goupille, Denis Mulleman and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David TernantCNRS, UMR 7292, 'Genetics, Immunotherapy, Chemistry and Cancer', Université François Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France; Laboratoire de pharmacologie-toxicologie, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Emilie Ducourau
Piéra Fuzibet
Céline Vignault
Hervé Watier
Thierry Lequerré
Xavier Le Loët
Olivier Vittecoq
Philippe Goupille
Denis Mulleman
Gilles Paintaud
Université de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed at describing adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK) and the concentration-effect relationship of adalimumab using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsAdalimumab PK and PK-PD data were obtained from a multicentric observational study. Adalimumab (40 mg) was administered subcutaneously every other week, and its pharmacokinetics was described using a one-compartment model. The relationship between adalimumab concentration and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration was described using an indirect response model with inhibition of CRP input, whereas the relationship between adalimumab concentration and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) was described using a direct inhibition model. Dose regimens that included a loading dose of adalimumab were simulated.

resultsThirty patients treated for RA were analysed. The following pharmacokinetic and PK-PD parameters were estimated (interidividual coefficient of variation): apparent volume of distribution (Vd /F) = 10.8 l (92%); apparent clearance (CL/F) = 0.32 l day(-1) (17%); first-order absorption rate (ka ) = 0.28 day(-1) ; CRP input (kin ) = 22.0 mg l(-1)  day(-1) (65%); adalimumab concentration leading to a 50% decrease in kin (C50 ) = 3.6 mg l(-1) (88%); baseline DAS28 (DAS0 ) = 5.5 mg l(-1) (11%); and adalimumab concentration leading to 50% decrease of DAS0 (IC50 ) = 11.0 mg l(-1) (71%). Simulations showed that a 160 mg loading dose should reduce the time to reach efficacy in terms of both CRP and DAS28 after the first injection.

conclusionsThis is the first study to describe adalimumab pharmacokinetics and the concentration-effect relationship in RA. A 160 mg loading dose may lead to an increased benefit from treatment in RA patients.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdalimumabAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidComputer SimulationC-Reactive ProteinDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsC-Reactive Proteinadalimumabpharmacodynamicspharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modellingpharmacokineticsrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID25223394
PMCPMC4309634
OpenAlexW1602142879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.