Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25223353›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

L W Pisa, V Amaral-Rogers, L P Belzunces, J M Bonmatin, C A Downs, D Goulson, D P Kreutzweiser, C Krupke, M Liess, M McField and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 245 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
245citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
64.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

245 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 921 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Neonicotinoid Levels Exceed EPA Benchmarks in Half of Waterways on Illinois Protected Lands.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transfer of veterinary parasiticides from the fur lining bird's nest to eggs and chicks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

L W PisaEnvironmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands, l.w.pisa@uu.nl.
V Amaral-Rogers
L P Belzunces
J M Bonmatin
C A Downs
D Goulson
D P Kreutzweiser
C Krupke
M Liess
M McField
C A Morrissey
D A Noome
J Settele
N Simon-Delso
J D Stark
J P Van der Sluijs
H Van Dyck
M Wiemers
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEUtrecht University · NLBuglife · GBCentre de Biophysique Moléculaire · FRDépartement Environnement et Agronomie · FRGC Systems (United States) · USNatural Resources Canada · CAPublic Health Institute of Malawi · MWPurdue University West Lafayette · USUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the state of knowledge regarding the effects of large-scale pollution with neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on non-target invertebrate species of terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. A large section of the assessment is dedicated to the state of knowledge on sublethal effects on honeybees (Apis mellifera) because this important pollinator is the most studied non-target invertebrate species. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Lumbricidae (earthworms), Apoidae sensu lato (bumblebees, solitary bees) and the section "other invertebrates" review available studies on the other terrestrial species. The sections on freshwater and marine species are rather short as little is known so far about the impact of neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on the diverse invertebrate fauna of these widely exposed habitats. For terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate species, the known effects of neonicotinoid pesticides and fipronil are described ranging from organismal toxicology and behavioural effects to population-level effects. For earthworms, freshwater and marine species, the relation of findings to regulatory risk assessment is described. Neonicotinoid insecticides exhibit very high toxicity to a wide range of invertebrates, particularly insects, and field-realistic exposure is likely to result in both lethal and a broad range of important sublethal impacts. There is a major knowledge gap regarding impacts on the grand majority of invertebrates, many of which perform essential roles enabling healthy ecosystem functioning. The data on the few non-target species on which field tests have been performed are limited by major flaws in the outdated test protocols. Despite large knowledge gaps and uncertainties, enough knowledge exists to conclude that existing levels of pollution with neonicotinoids and fipronil resulting from presently authorized uses frequently exceed the lowest observed adverse effect concentrations and are thus likely to have large-scale and wide ranging negative biological and ecological impacts on a wide range of non-target invertebrates in terrestrial, aquatic, marine and benthic habitats.

Indexed as

AnimalsEcosystemEnvironmental PollutantsInsecticidesInvertebratesNicotinic AgonistsPollinationPyrazolesRisk AssessmentEnvironmental PollutantsfipronilInsecticidesNicotinic AgonistsPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID25223353
PMCPMC4284392
OpenAlexW2151468553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.