ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015
Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 245 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
245 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 921 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in soil microbial communities after exposure to neonicotinoids: A systematic review.Environmental microbiology reports · 2023Pooled it
- Fungicides, herbicides and bees: A systematic review of existing research and methods.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Agricultural Fungicide Mancozeb in Leaf Litter Enhances Survival and Growth of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).Environmental toxicology · 2026Article
- Neonicotinoid Levels Exceed EPA Benchmarks in Half of Waterways on Illinois Protected Lands.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2026Article
- Host plant use by spittlebug nymphs in agroecosystems: a field survey supporting targeted vegetation management.Journal of economic entomology · 2026Article
- Toxicological effects of a difenoconazole fungicide on a non-target butterfly.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- RNA Interference TargetingInsects · 2026Article
- Interspecific foraging response to the thiacloprid treatment of co-existing top spider predators.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transfer of veterinary parasiticides from the fur lining bird's nest to eggs and chicks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Health Status ofToxics · 2026Article
- Effects of Prey-Mediated Sublethal Exposure to Imidacloprid and Nitenpyram on the Fitness and Predation Capacity inInsects · 2026Article
- Neonicotinoids: insecticides or a threat to public health?Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Exposure route mediates toxicological effects of sulphur and fluxapyroxad fungicides in a non-target butterfly.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Transgenerational Consequences of Imidacloprid Larval Diet Contamination in the Sheep BlowflyInsects · 2025Article
- Exploiting nectar and blood feeding cues and phagostimulants to optimise Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits against a sand fly vector of leishmaniasis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Toxicological Effects of Lufenuron on Antioxidant Defence in Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella).Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Synergistic effect of the next generation insecticide flupyradifurone with a fungal pathogen in the ant Lasius niger.Scientific reports · 2025Article
185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed the state of knowledge regarding the effects of large-scale pollution with neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on non-target invertebrate species of terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. A large section of the assessment is dedicated to the state of knowledge on sublethal effects on honeybees (Apis mellifera) because this important pollinator is the most studied non-target invertebrate species. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Lumbricidae (earthworms), Apoidae sensu lato (bumblebees, solitary bees) and the section "other invertebrates" review available studies on the other terrestrial species. The sections on freshwater and marine species are rather short as little is known so far about the impact of neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on the diverse invertebrate fauna of these widely exposed habitats. For terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate species, the known effects of neonicotinoid pesticides and fipronil are described ranging from organismal toxicology and behavioural effects to population-level effects. For earthworms, freshwater and marine species, the relation of findings to regulatory risk assessment is described. Neonicotinoid insecticides exhibit very high toxicity to a wide range of invertebrates, particularly insects, and field-realistic exposure is likely to result in both lethal and a broad range of important sublethal impacts. There is a major knowledge gap regarding impacts on the grand majority of invertebrates, many of which perform essential roles enabling healthy ecosystem functioning. The data on the few non-target species on which field tests have been performed are limited by major flaws in the outdated test protocols. Despite large knowledge gaps and uncertainties, enough knowledge exists to conclude that existing levels of pollution with neonicotinoids and fipronil resulting from presently authorized uses frequently exceed the lowest observed adverse effect concentrations and are thus likely to have large-scale and wide ranging negative biological and ecological impacts on a wide range of non-target invertebrates in terrestrial, aquatic, marine and benthic habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.