ArticleEpidemiology and health2014
Narrative reviews.
Article in Epidemiology and health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of sub-national food insecurity research in South Africa: Missed opportunities for policy insights.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Epstein-Barr Virus and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression of Case-control Studies.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2016Pooled it
- Hormonal Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Lung Cancer in Women: An Adaptive Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2015Pooled it
- Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Breast Cancer in Korean Women: A Quantitative Systematic Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2015Pooled it
- The Multidimensional Impact of Traditional Orthopaedic Casting and the Role of Emerging Immobilization Technologies: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Narrative Review of Digital Twins in the Health Domain: Development, Application, and Evidence Consolidation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Root cause analysis and strategies for reducing falls among inpatients in healthcare facilities: A narrative review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on speech-language and hearing professions in low- and middle-income countries: Challenges and opportunities explored.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022Article
- Gambling in Sub-Saharan Africa: Traditional Forms and Emerging Technologies.Current addiction reports · 2022Review
- Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function: a narrative review of clinical evidence.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Review
- Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2020Article
- Mapping Bioethics in Latin America: History, Theoretical Models, and Scientific Output.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019Review
- Core knowledge translation competencies: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Human papillomavirus infection and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.Infectious agents and cancer · 2016Article
- The necessity of an observational study on the interactions between allergic history and citrus fruit intake for the prevention of pancreatic cancer.Epidemiology and health · 2015Article
- Human papillomavirus infection and risk of lung cancer in never-smokers and women: an 'adaptive' meta-analysis.Epidemiology and health · 2015Review
- Human papillomavirus 16 infection as a potential risk factor for prostate cancer: an adaptive meta-analysis.Epidemiology and health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although qualitative researches (QR) are invaluable in understanding complex healthcare situations, the quantitative systematic reviews could not treat them. To improve quality of healthcare services, results of QR should be considered in healthcare decision-making processes. Several methods and theories for synthesizing evidences of QR have been developed. In order to activate the narrative reviews and mixed methods reviews in Korean healthcare academies, I arranged the related nomenclatures and suggested some issues to conduct them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.