Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25222836›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2014

Deciphering intratumor heterogeneity and temporal acquisition of driver events to refine precision medicine.

Crispin Hiley, Elza C de Bruin, Nicholas McGranahan, Charles Swanton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Impact of Concordance between Liquid and Tissue Biopsy for Actionable Mutations: Insights from the ROME Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Systematic data analysis pipeline for quantitative morphological cell phenotyping.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The reckoning of chromosomal instability: past, present, future.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The nature of cancer.Frontiers of medicine · 2023
    Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Crispin Hiley
Elza C de Bruin
Nicholas McGranahan
Charles Swanton

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17786Cancer Research UK 19310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of multiple subclones within tumors mandates understanding of longitudinal and spatial subclonal dynamics. Resolving the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of subclones with cancer driver events may offer insight into therapy response, tumor evolutionary histories and clinical trial design.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorClonal EvolutionHumansNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25222836
PMCPMC4281956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.