Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25222698›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

Aetiologies of diarrhoea in adults from urban and rural treatment facilities in Bangladesh.

F Ferdous, S Ahmed, F D Farzana, J Das, M A Malek, S K Das, M A Salam, A S G Faruque

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epidemiology of EnterotoxigenicMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Prevalence of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

F FerdousInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
S AhmedInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
F D FarzanaInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
J DasInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
M A MalekInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
S K DasInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
M A SalamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
A S G FaruqueInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh(icddr,b).
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of our analysis was to describe the aetiology, clinical features, and socio-demographic background of adults with diarrhoea attending different urban and rural diarrhoeal disease hospitals in Bangladesh. Between January 2010 and December 2011, a total of 5054 adult diarrhoeal patients aged ⩾20 years were enrolled into the Diarrhoeal Disease Surveillance Systems at four different hospitals (two rural and two urban) of Bangladesh. Middle-aged [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0·28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·23-0·35, P < 0·001] and elderly (aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·11-0·20, P < 0·001) patients were more likely to present to rural diarrhoeal disease facilities than urban ones. Vibrio cholerae was the most commonly isolated pathogen (16%) of the four pathogens tested followed by rotavirus (5%), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (4%), and Shigella (4%). Of these pathogens, V. cholerae (19% vs. 11%, P < 0·001), ETEC (9% vs. 4%, P < 0·001), and rotavirus (5% vs. 3%, P = 0·013) were more commonly detected from patients presenting to urban hospitals than rural hospitals, but Shigella was more frequently isolated from patients presenting to rural hospitals than urban hospitals (7% vs. 2%, P < 0·001). The isolation rate of Shigella was higher in the elderly than in younger adults (8% vs. 3%, P < 0·001). Some or severe dehydration was higher in urban adults than rural adults (P < 0·001). Our findings indicate that despite economic and other progress made, conditions facilitating transmission of V. cholerae and Shigella prevail in adults with diarrhoea in Bangladesh and further efforts are needed to control these infections.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBangladeshCholeraDehydrationDiarrheaDysentery, BacillaryEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRotavirusRotavirus Infectionsurban

Identifiers

PMID25222698
PMCPMC9507204
OpenAlexW1980554823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.