ArticleAnalytical chemistry2014
High sensitivity combined with extended structural coverage of labile compounds via nanoelectrospray ionization at subambient pressures.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tailoring isomeric transformations and surface adsorption dynamics of glycopeptides under thermal and photolytic stress.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A 3D-printed sub-atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization source for robust, facile, and flexible mass spectrometry analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Carrier-Assisted Single-Tube Processing Approach for Targeted Proteomics Analysis of Low Numbers of Mammalian Cells.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Analytical Scheme Leading to Integrated High-Sensitivity Profiling of Glycosphingolipids Together with N- and O-Glycans from One Sample.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018Article
- Glycomic and glycoproteomic analysis of glycoproteins-a tutorial.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Recent Advances in the Analysis of Complex Glycoproteins.Analytical chemistry · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray (SPIN) has proven to be effective in producing ions with high efficiency and transmitting them to low pressures for increased sensitivity in mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Here we present evidence that the SPIN source not only improves MS sensitivity but also facilitates the detection of more labile compounds. The gentleness of conventional heated capillary electrospray ionization (ESI) and the SPIN designs was compared in conjunction with the liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis of colominic acid and N-glycans containing sialic acid. Prior experiments conducted with the SPIN interface demonstrated the ability to detect labile glycans such as heavily sialylated and polysialic acid N-glycans, which are difficult to detect with a conventional ESI-MS interface. Colominic acid is a mixture of sialic acid polymers of different lengths containing labile glycosidic linkages between monomer units necessitating a gentle ion source. These labile covalent bonds may display similar behavior to sialic acid chains in N-glycans during MS analysis. By coupling the SPIN source with high-resolution mass spectrometry and using advanced data processing tools, we demonstrate much extended coverage of sialic acid polymer chains as compared to conventional ESI-MS and the ability to detect sialic acid containing N-glycans without the need of sample derivatization. In addition, we show that SPIN-LC-MS is effective in elucidating polymer features with high efficiency and high sensitivity previously unattainable by the conventional ESI-LC-MS methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.