Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25222488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Natural allelic diversity, genetic structure and linkage disequilibrium pattern in wild chickpea.

Maneesha S Saxena, Deepak Bajaj, Alice Kujur, Shouvik Das, Saurabh Badoni, Vinod Kumar, Mohar Singh, Kailash C Bansal, Akhilesh K Tyagi, Swarup K Parida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Novel Alleles fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. MALDI-TOF-MS-based high throughput genotyping of mutations associated with body measurement traits in cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CLAVATA signaling pathway genes modulating flowering time and flower number in chickpea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Altered Expression of anFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic dissection of plant growth habit in chickpea.Functional & integrative genomics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maneesha S SaxenaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Deepak BajajNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Alice KujurNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Shouvik DasNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh BadoniNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Vinod KumarNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology (NRCPB), New Delhi, India.
Mohar SinghNational Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR), New Delhi, India.
Kailash C BansalNational Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR), New Delhi, India.
Akhilesh K TyagiNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Swarup K ParidaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterization of natural allelic diversity and understanding the genetic structure and linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern in wild germplasm accessions by large-scale genotyping of informative microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers is requisite to facilitate chickpea genetic improvement. Large-scale validation and high-throughput genotyping of genome-wide physically mapped 478 genic and genomic microsatellite markers and 380 transcription factor gene-derived SNP markers using gel-based assay, fluorescent dye-labelled automated fragment analyser and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass array have been performed. Outcome revealed their high genotyping success rate (97.5%) and existence of a high level of natural allelic diversity among 94 wild and cultivated Cicer accessions. High intra- and inter-specific polymorphic potential and wider molecular diversity (11-94%) along with a broader genetic base (13-78%) specifically in the functional genic regions of wild accessions was assayed by mapped markers. It suggested their utility in monitoring introgression and transferring target trait-specific genomic (gene) regions from wild to cultivated gene pool for the genetic enhancement. Distinct species/gene pool-wise differentiation, admixed domestication pattern, and differential genome-wide recombination and LD estimates/decay observed in a six structured population of wild and cultivated accessions using mapped markers further signifies their usefulness in chickpea genetics, genomics and breeding.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAllelesChromosome MappingCicerGenomicsGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25222488
PMCPMC4164632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.