ArticlePloS one2014
DNA barcoding for species assignment: the case of Mediterranean marine fishes.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrative taxonomic characterization of extremophile fish Aphanius almiriensis (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes) in a hypersaline geothermal system (NW Anatolia).Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Phylogeography of the widely distributed John Dory (Zeus faber, Actinopterygii: Zeiformes) reaffirms the prevalence of at least two deeply divergent clades.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Robust discrimination between closely related species of salmon based on DNA fragments.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- DNA barcode reference library of the fish larvae and eggs of the South China Sea: taxonomic effectiveness and geographic structure.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- An Odyssey of Integrative Taxonomy Unveils Marine Fish Diversity, New Records and Cryptic Species in Malaysian Waters.Zoological studies · 2024Article
- DNA barcoding the ichthyofauna of the Beibu Gulf: Implications for fisheries management in a seafood market hub.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- To Be, or Not to Be: That Is the Hamletic Question of Cryptic Evolution in the Eastern Atlantic and MediterraneanAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
- Global Terrapin Character-Based DNA Barcodes: Assessment of the Mitochondrial COI Gene and Conservation Status Revealed a Putative Cryptic Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Master-Key Regulators of Sex Determination in Fish and Other Vertebrates-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Absence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- DNA-based taxonomy of a mangrove-associated community of fishes in Southeast Asia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Triple barcoding for a hyperparasite, its parasitic host, and the host itself: a study of Cyclocotyla bellones (Monogenea) on Ceratothoa parallela (Isopoda) on Boops boops (Teleostei).Parasite (Paris, France) · 2021Article
- DNA barcoding to characterize biodiversity of freshwater fishes of Egypt.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- DNA barcoding and species delimitation of the Old World tooth-carps, family Aphaniidae Hoedeman, 1949 (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes).PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Morphometric convergence among European sand gobies in freshwater (Gobiiformes: Gobionellidae).Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Metabarcoding a diverse arthropod mock community.Molecular ecology resources · 2019Article
- DNA barcoding of coastal ray-finned fishes in Vietnam.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA barcoding enhances the prospects for species-level identifications globally using a standardized and authenticated DNA-based approach. Reference libraries comprising validated DNA barcodes (COI) constitute robust datasets for testing query sequences, providing considerable utility to identify marine fish and other organisms. Here we test the feasibility of using DNA barcoding to assign species to tissue samples from fish collected in the central Mediterranean Sea, a major contributor to the European marine ichthyofaunal diversity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsA dataset of 1278 DNA barcodes, representing 218 marine fish species, was used to test the utility of DNA barcodes to assign species from query sequences. We tested query sequences against 1) a reference library of ranked DNA barcodes from the neighbouring North East Atlantic, and 2) the public databases BOLD and GenBank. In the first case, a reference library comprising DNA barcodes with reliability grades for 146 fish species was used as diagnostic dataset to screen 486 query DNA sequences from fish specimens collected in the central basin of the Mediterranean Sea. Of all query sequences suitable for comparisons 98% were unambiguously confirmed through complete match with reference DNA barcodes. In the second case, it was possible to assign species to 83% (BOLD-IDS) and 72% (GenBank) of the sequences from the Mediterranean. Relatively high intraspecific genetic distances were found in 7 species (2.2%-18.74%), most of them of high commercial relevance, suggesting possible cryptic species. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We emphasize the discriminatory power of COI barcodes and their application to cases requiring species level resolution starting from query sequences. Results highlight the value of public reference libraries of reliability grade-annotated DNA barcodes, to identify species from different geographical origins. The ability to assign species with high precision from DNA samples of disparate quality and origin has major utility in several fields, from fisheries and conservation programs to control of fish products authenticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.