Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25221662›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2014

Novel cyclic biphalin analogue with improved antinociceptive properties.

Adriano Mollica, Alfonso Carotenuto, Ettore Novellino, Antonio Limatola, Roberto Costante, Francesco Pinnen, Azzurra Stefanucci, Stefano Pieretti, Anna Borsodi, Reza Samavati and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities against VariousMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adriano MollicaDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Chieti-Pescara "G. d'Annunzio" , Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Alfonso CarotenutoDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Napoli "Federico II" , Via D. Montesano, 49, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Ettore NovellinoDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Napoli "Federico II" , Via D. Montesano, 49, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonio LimatolaDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Napoli "Federico II" , Via D. Montesano, 49, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Roberto CostanteDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Chieti-Pescara "G. d'Annunzio" , Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Francesco PinnenDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Chieti-Pescara "G. d'Annunzio" , Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Azzurra StefanucciDipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza, Università di Roma , P.le A. Moro, 5, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Stefano PierettiDepartment of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità , V.le Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Anna BorsodiInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences , 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Reza SamavatiInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences , 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Ferenc ZadorInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences , 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Sándor BenyheInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences , 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Peg DavisDepartment of Pharmacology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States.
Frank PorrecaDepartment of Pharmacology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States.
Victor J HrubyDepartment of Pharmacology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two novel opioid analogues have been designed by substituting the native d-Ala residues in position 2,2' of biphalin with two residues of d-penicillamine or l-penicillamine and by forming a disulfide bond between the thiol groups. The so-obtained compound 9 containing d-penicillamines showed excellent μ/δ mixed receptor affinities (K i (δ) = 5.2 nM; K i (μ) = 1.9 nM), together with an efficacious capacity to trigger the second messenger and a very good in vivo antinociceptive activity, whereas product 10 was scarcely active. An explanation of the two different pharmacological behaviors of products 9 and 10 was found by studying their conformational properties.

Indexed as

Analgesicsbiphalincyclic analoguesdimeric opioid peptides

Identifiers

PMID25221662
PMCPMC4160744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.