Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25221631›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2014

Optimization of Aqueous Biphasic Tumor Spheroid Microtechnology for Anti-Cancer Drug Testing in 3D Culture.

Stephanie Lemmo, Ehsan Atefi, Gary D Luker, Hossein Tavana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Three-Dimensional Spheroids for Cancer Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Three-dimensional models of breast cancer-fibroblasts interactions.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie LemmoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States.
Ehsan AtefiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States.
Gary D LukerDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ; Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ; Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Hossein TavanaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States.
University of Akron · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

A Novel High Throughput Tumor Spheroid MicrotechnologyR21CA182333 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF AKRON · PI LUKER, GARY D, TAVANA, HOSSEIN · 2013 to 2014
$503k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor spheroids are three-dimensional clusters of cancer cells that exhibit characteristics of poorly perfused tumors and hence present a relevant model for testing the efficacy of anti-cancer compounds. The use of spheroids for drug screening is hindered by technological complexities for high throughput generation of consistent size spheroids individually addressable by drug compounds. Here we present and optimize a simple spheroid technology based on the use of an aqueous two-phase system. Cancer cells confined in a drop of the denser aqueous dextran phase are robotically dispensed into a microwell containing the immersion aqueous polyethylene glycol phase. Cells remain within the drop and form a viable spheroid, without a need for any external stimuli. The size of resulting spheroids is sensitive to volume variations of dispensed drops from the air displacement pipetting head of a commercial liquid handling robot. Therefore, we parametrically optimize the process of dispensing of dextran phase drops. For a given cell density, this optimization reproducibly generates consistent size spheroids in standard 96-well plates. In addition, we evaluate the use of a commercial biochemical assay to examine cellular viability of cancer cell spheroids. Spheroids show a dose-dependent response to cisplatin similar to a monolayer culture. However unlike their two-dimensional counterpart, spheroids exhibit resistance to paclitaxel treatment. This technology, which uses only commercially-available reagents and equipment, can potentially expedite anti-cancer drug discovery. Although the use of robotics makes the ATPS spheroid technology particularly useful for drug screening applications, this approach is compatible with simpler liquid handling techniques such as manual micropipetting and offers a straightforward method of 3D cell culture in research laboratories.

Indexed as

3D (Three-Dimensional) CultureAnti-Cancer Drug ScreeningAqueous Two-Phase SystemHigh ThroughputTumor Spheroid

Identifiers

PMID25221631
PMCPMC4159185
OpenAlexW1985471235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.