ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014
On the current status of Phakopsora pachyrhizi genome sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing a crop- wild-reservoir pathogen system to understand pathogen evolution and emergence.eLife · 2025Article
- Soybean-Phakopsora pachyrhizi interactions: towards the development of next-generation disease-resistant plants.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Major proliferation of transposable elements shaped the genome of the soybean rust pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi.Nature communications · 2023Article
- UnderstandingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Smut fungi as a stratagem to characterize rust effectors: opportunities and challenges.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2020Review
- Reduction of Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection on soybean through host- and spray-induced gene silencing.Molecular plant pathology · 2020Article
- Article
- The coffee leaf rust pathogen Hemileia vastatrix: one and a half centuries around the tropics.Molecular plant pathology · 2017Review
- Comparative transcriptome analysis and identification of candidate effectors in two related rust species (Gymnosporangium yamadae and Gymnosporangium asiaticum).BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Fighting Asian Soybean Rust.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of sequencing technologies and bioinformatics allow a more rapid access to genomes of non-model organisms at sinking costs. Accordingly, draft genomes of several economically important cereal rust fungi have been released in the last 3 years. Aside from the very recent flax rust and poplar rust draft assemblies there are no genomic data available for other dicot-infecting rust fungi. In this article we outline rust fungus sequencing efforts and comment on the current status of Phakopsora pachyrhizi (Asian soybean rust) genome sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.