Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25221549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Bacterial population succession and adaptation affected by insecticide application and soil spraying history.

Hideomi Itoh, Ronald Navarro, Kazutaka Takeshita, Kanako Tago, Masahito Hayatsu, Tomoyuki Hori, Yoshitomo Kikuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. DiazotrophicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hideomi ItohBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Sapporo, Japan.
Ronald NavarroResearch Institute for Environmental Management Technology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba, Japan.
Kazutaka TakeshitaBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Sapporo, Japan.
Kanako TagoEnvironmental Biofunction Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences Tsukuba, Japan.
Masahito HayatsuEnvironmental Biofunction Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences Tsukuba, Japan.
Tomoyuki HoriResearch Institute for Environmental Management Technology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshitomo KikuchiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Sapporo, Japan.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPNational Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although microbial communities have varying degrees of exposure to environmental stresses such as chemical pollution, little is known on how these communities respond to environmental disturbances and how past disturbance history affects these community-level responses. To comprehensively understand the effect of organophosphorus insecticide application on microbiota in soils with or without insecticide-spraying history, we investigated the microbial succession in response to the addition of fenitrothion [O,O-dimethyl O-(3-methyl-p-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate, abbreviated as MEP] by culture-dependent experiments and deep sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Despite similar microbial composition at the initial stage, microbial response to MEP application was remarkably different between soils with and without MEP-spraying history. MEP-degrading microbes more rapidly increased in the soils with MEP-spraying history, suggesting that MEP-degrading bacteria might already exist at a certain level and could quickly respond to MEP re-treatment in the soil. Culture-dependent and -independent evaluations revealed that MEP-degrading Burkholderia bacteria are predominant in soils after MEP application, limited members of which might play a pivotal role in MEP-degradation in soils. Notably, deep sequencing also revealed that some methylotrophs dramatically increased after MEP application, strongly suggesting that these bacteria play a role in the consumption and removal of methanol, a harmful derivative from MEP-degradation, for better growth of MEP-degrading bacteria. This comprehensive study demonstrated the succession and adaptation processes of microbial communities under MEP application, which were critically affected by past experience of insecticide-spraying.

Indexed as

Burkholderiadeep sequencingfenitrothionmethylotrophorganophosphorus insecticidesoil microbes

Identifiers

PMID25221549
PMCPMC4148734
OpenAlexW2091771766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.