Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25221343›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2014

Standardised Registration of Surgical Complications in Laparoscopic-Gynaecological Therapeutic Procedures Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

M P Radosa, G Meyberg-Solomayer, J Radosa, J Vorwergk, K Oettler, A Mothes, S Baum, I Juhasz-Boess, E Petri, E F Solomayer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M P RadosaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena.
G Meyberg-SolomayerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar.
J RadosaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar.
J VorwergkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena.
K OettlerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena.
A MothesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena.
S BaumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar.
I Juhasz-BoessDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar.
E PetriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Greifswald, Greifswald.
E F SolomayerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar.
I B RunnebaumDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

complicationsgynaecological surgerylaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID25221343
PMCPMC4153816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.