ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2015
ASTM international workshop on standards and measurements for tissue engineering scaffolds.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative advances and future perspectives in injectable hydrogels for wound healing: a comprehensive review.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- A bioactive composite of freeze-dried stem cells, porous microcarriers, and fibrinogen-thrombin gel for dental pulp tissue engineering.American journal of stem cells · 2026Article
- Potential of organ-on-a-chip in advancing synthetic extracellular matrix technology for bone tissue engineering in dentistry (Review).Biomedical reports · 2026Review
- PorMe: A validated open-source image-based pore size and porosity measurement tool for 3D-printed structures.MethodsX · 2025Article
- In Vivo Cell Migration and Growth Within Electrospun Porous Nanofibrous Scaffolds with Different Pore Sizes in a Mouse Pouch Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Standardised Matrices for Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Tissue adhesive hemostatic microneedle arrays for rapid hemorrhage treatment.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Bioprinting and biomaterials for dental alveolar tissue regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Sensor technologies for quality control in engineered tissue manufacturing.Biofabrication · 2022Review
- Article
- Advances in Porous Scaffold Design for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2019Review
- Nanofiber scaffolds influence organelle structure and function in bone marrow stromal cells.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2017Article
- Essential design considerations for the resazurin reduction assay to noninvasively quantify cell expansion within perfused extracellular matrix scaffolds.Biomaterials · 2017Article
- Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response.Biomaterials · 2016Review
- DiameterJ: A validated open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool.Biomaterials · 2015Article
- Current standards and ethical landscape of engineered tissues-3D bioprinting perspective.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "Workshop on Standards & Measurements for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds" was held on May 21, 2013 in Indianapolis, IN, and was sponsored by the ASTM International (ASTM). The purpose of the workshop was to identify the highest priority items for future standards work for scaffolds used in the development and manufacture of tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs). Eighteen speakers and 78 attendees met to assess current scaffold standards and to prioritize needs for future standards. A key finding was that the ASTM TEMPs subcommittees (F04.41-46) have many active "guide" documents for educational purposes, but few standard "test methods" or "practices." Overwhelmingly, the most clearly identified need was standards for measuring the structure of scaffolds, followed by standards for biological characterization, including in vitro testing, animal models and cell-material interactions. The third most pressing need was to develop standards for assessing the mechanical properties of scaffolds. Additional needs included standards for assessing scaffold degradation, clinical outcomes with scaffolds, effects of sterilization on scaffolds, scaffold composition, and drug release from scaffolds. Discussions highlighted the need for additional scaffold reference materials and the need to use them for measurement traceability. Workshop participants emphasized the need to promote the use of standards in scaffold fabrication, characterization, and commercialization. Finally, participants noted that standards would be more broadly accepted if their impact in the TEMPs community could be quantified. Many scaffold standard needs have been identified and focus is turning to generating these standards to support the use of scaffolds in TEMPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.