ArticleDevelopmental neurobiology2015
He hears, she hears: are there sex differences in auditory processing?
Article in Developmental neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Athleticism and sex impact neural processing of sound.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Sex differences in auditory processing vary across estrous cycle.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sex Differences are Reflected in Microstructural White Matter Alterations of Musical Sophistication: A Diffusion MRI Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Sex differences in the development and expression of a preference for familiar vocal signals in songbirds.PloS one · 2021Article
- Early Auditory Experience Modifies Neuronal Firing Properties in the Zebra Finch Auditory Cortex.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2020Article
- Regular Music Exposure in Juvenile Rats Facilitates Conditioned Fear Extinction and Reduces Anxiety after Foot Shock in Adulthood.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- A Membrane G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Sex Differences in Zebra Finch Auditory Coding.Endocrinology · 2018Article
- Norepinephrine enhances song responsiveness and encoding in the auditory forebrain of male zebra finches.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- ZENK induction in the zebra finch brain by song: Relationship to hemisphere, rhythm, oestradiol and sex.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2017Article
- HDAC3 Inhibitor RGFP966 Modulates Neuronal Memory for Vocal Communication Signals in a Songbird Model.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017Article
- It takes a seasoned bird to be a good listener: communication between the sexes.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016Review
- Sex differences in behavioural and neural responsiveness to mate calls in a parrot.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2016Article
- The importance of neural aromatization in the acquisition, recall, and integration of song and spatial memories in passerines.Hormones and behavior · 2015Review
- Sex differences and rapid estrogen signaling: A look at songbird audition.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2015Review
- Sex differences in the representation of call stimuli in a songbird secondary auditory area.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Songbirds learn individually unique songs through vocal imitation and use them in courtship and territorial displays. Previous work has identified a forebrain auditory area, the caudomedial nidopallium (NCM), that appears specialized for discriminating and remembering conspecific vocalizations. In zebra finches (ZFs), only males produce learned vocalizations, but both sexes process these and other signals. This study assessed sex differences in auditory processing by recording extracellular multiunit activity at multiple sites within NCM. Juvenile female ZFs (n = 46) were reared in individual isolation and artificially tutored with song. In adulthood, songs were played back to assess auditory responses, stimulus-specific adaptation, neural bias for conspecific song, and memory for the tutor's song, as well as recently heard songs. In a subset of females (n = 36), estradiol (E2) levels were manipulated to test the contribution of E2, known to be synthesized in the brain, to auditory responses. Untreated females (n = 10) showed significant differences in response magnitude and stimulus-specific adaptation compared to males reared in the same paradigm (n = 9). In hormone-manipulated females, E2 augmentation facilitated the memory for recently heard songs in adulthood, but neither E2 augmentation (n = 15) nor E2 synthesis blockade (n = 9) affected tutor song memory or the neural bias for conspecific song. The results demonstrate subtle sex differences in processing communication signals, and show that E2 levels in female songbirds can affect the memory for songs of potential suitors, thus contributing to the process of mate selection. The results also have potential relevance to clinical interventions that manipulate E2 in human patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.