Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25220861›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of psychiatry2014

Clinical outcomes and genome-wide association for a brain methylation site in an antidepressant pharmacogenetics study in Mexican Americans.

Ma-Li Wong, Chuanhui Dong, Deborah L Flores, Monika Ehrhart-Bornstein, Stefan Bornstein, Mauricio Arcos-Burgos, Julio Licinio

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Molecular psychiatry: 20 years.Molecular psychiatry · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ma-Li WongFrom the Mind and Brain Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, and the Department of Psychiatry, Flinders University School of Medicine, Adelaide, Australia; the Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami; the Department of Psychiatry, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif.; Medical Clinic III, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; and the John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Chuanhui Dong
Deborah L Flores
Monika Ehrhart-Bornstein
Stefan Bornstein
Mauricio Arcos-Burgos
Julio Licinio
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

ZDV &3TC NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFECTED INFANTS &M01RR000865 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WASHINGTON, ARNOLD E. · 1985 to 2011
$43.4M
UCLA PHARMACOGENETICS &PHARMACOGENOMICS RESEARCH GROUPU01GM061394 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LICINIO, JULIO · 2000 to 2005
$4.7M
Depression/Metabolic Syndrome in Mexican-American Women.R01DK063240 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WONG, MA-LI · 2002 to 2006
$1.9M
Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant DrugsK24RR017365 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WONG, MA-LI · 2003 to 2007
$727k
Clinical Neuroendocrinology of LeptinK24RR016996 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LICINIO, JULIO · 2002 to 2006
$662k
CNS transcription modulation in peripheral inflammationR21MH062777 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WONG, MA-LI · 2001 to 2002
$306k
NCRR NIH HHS K24 RR016996NCRR NIH HHS K24 RR017365NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000865NCRR NIH HHS RR000865NCRR NIH HHS RR017365NCRR NIH HHS RR16996NIDDK NIH HHS DK063240NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK063240NIGMS NIH HHS GM61394NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061394NIMH NIH HHS MH062777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors compared the effectiveness of fluoxetine and desipramine treatment in a prospective double-blind pharmacogenetics study in first-generation Mexican Americans and examined the role of whole-exome functional gene variations in the patients' antidepressant response.

methodA total of 232 Mexican Americans who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to receive 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with desipramine (50-200 mg/day) or fluoxetine (10-40 mg/day) after a 1-week placebo lead-in period. Outcome measures included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory. At week 8, whole-exome genotyping data were obtained for 36 participants who remitted and 29 who did not respond to treatment.

resultsCompared with desipramine treatment, fluoxetine treatment was associated with a greater reduction in HAM-D score, higher response and remission rates, shorter time to response and remission, and lower incidences of anticholinergic and cardiovascular side effects. Pharmacogenetics analysis showed that exm-rs1321744 achieved exome-wide significance for treatment remission. This variant is located in a brain methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing site, which suggests that it may be involved in epigenetic regulation of neuronal gene expression. This and two other common gene variants provided a highly accurate cross-validated predictive model for treatment remission of major depression (receiver operating characteristic integral=0.95).

conclusionsCompared with desipramine, fluoxetine treatment showed a more rapid reduction of HAM-D score and a lower incidence of side effects in a population comprising primarily first-generation Mexican Americans with major depression. This study's pharmacogenetics approach strongly implicates the role of functional variants in antidepressant treatment response.

Indexed as

Mexican AmericansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDesipramineDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFluoxetineGenome-Wide Association StudyAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDesipramineFluoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25220861
PMCPMC5746054
OpenAlexW2141850944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.