Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25220822›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2014

A highly efficient design strategy for regression with outcome pooling.

Emily M Mitchell, Robert H Lyles, Amita K Manatunga, Neil J Perkins, Enrique F Schisterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Semiparametric isotonic regression modelling and estimation for group testing data.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily M MitchellDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, U.S.A.
Robert H Lyles
Amita K Manatunga
Neil J Perkins
Enrique F Schisterman

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
ROC Curve MethodologyZIAHD008761 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE F. · 2009 to 2021
$2.1M
Analytic Methods:Enviornmental/Reproductive EpidemiologyR01ES012458 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LYLES, ROBERT H, MANATUNGA, AMITA K. · 2003 to 2011
$1.8M
Accessible Handling of Misclassified or Missing Binary Variables in CER StudiesRC4NR012527 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LYLES, ROBERT H · 2010 to 2010
$442k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000454NIEHS NIH HHS 5R01ES012458-07NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012458NINR NIH HHS 1RC4NR012527-01NINR NIH HHS RC4 NR012527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential for research involving biospecimens can be hindered by the prohibitive cost of performing laboratory assays on individual samples. To mitigate this cost, strategies such as randomly selecting a portion of specimens for analysis or randomly pooling specimens prior to performing laboratory assays may be employed. These techniques, while effective in reducing cost, are often accompanied by a considerable loss of statistical efficiency. We propose a novel pooling strategy based on the k-means clustering algorithm to reduce laboratory costs while maintaining a high level of statistical efficiency when predictor variables are measured on all subjects, but the outcome of interest is assessed in pools. We perform simulations motivated by the BioCycle study to compare this k-means pooling strategy with current pooling and selection techniques under simple and multiple linear regression models. While all of the methods considered produce unbiased estimates and confidence intervals with appropriate coverage, pooling under k-means clustering provides the most precise estimates, closely approximating results from the full data and losing minimal precision as the total number of pools decreases. The benefits of k-means clustering evident in the simulation study are then applied to an analysis of the BioCycle dataset. In conclusion, when the number of lab tests is limited by budget, pooling specimens based on k-means clustering prior to performing lab assays can be an effective way to save money with minimal information loss in a regression setting.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisLinear ModelsResearch DesignAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansbiomarkersdesign-means clusteringpoolingregression analysis

Identifiers

PMID25220822
PMCPMC4225004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.