Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25220437›Full record

ArticleSynapse (New York, N.Y.)2015

Differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonism on spine density.

Rebecca M Ruddy, Yuxiao Chen, Marija Milenkovic, Amy J Ramsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synapse (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dendritic Spine Elimination: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca M RuddyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A8.
Yuxiao Chen
Marija Milenkovic
Amy J Ramsey
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

ENU Mutagenesis Screen for Genes of AddictionK01DA017703 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RAMSEY, AMY J · 2006 to 2009
$442k
CIHR MOP-119298NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA017703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors demonstrate that different NMDAR antagonists (ketamine and MK-801) have varying effects on spine density depending on dose, drug regimen, and brain region. While acute ketamine treatment increases cortical spine density in mice, subchronic exposure to either drug reduces spine density in both the cortex and striatum.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDendritic SpinesDizocilpine MaleateDose-Response Relationship, DrugExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ConfocalReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateantidepressantketamineMK-801NMDA receptorspine density

Identifiers

PMID25220437
PMCPMC5700749
OpenAlexW1494093774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.