ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014
Achieving minimum caseload requirements: an analysis of hospital quality control reports from 2004-2010.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cooperative spatial modelling of hospital compliance with minimum caseload requirements.International journal of health geographics · 2026Article
- Internal validation of self-reported case numbers in hospital quality reports: preparing secondary data for health services research.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- A theoretical framework for linking hospitals longitudinally: demonstrated using German Hospital Quality Reports 2016-2020.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Defining minimum volume thresholds to increase quality of care: a new patient-oriented approach using mixed integer programming.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Impact of suspending minimum volume requirements for knee arthroplasty on hospitals in Germany: an uncontrolled before-after study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Hospital volume-outcome relationship in total knee arthroplasty: protocol for a systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Article
- Volume-outcome relationship and minimum volume regulations in the German hospital sector - evidence from nationwide administrative hospital data for the years 2005-2007.Health economics review · 2018Article
- Minimum volume standards in German hospitals: do they get along with procedure centralization? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- [Minimum caseload requirements in urologic oncology: not without evidence from health services research].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2014Article
- Has the minimum caseload requirement failed? Strategic planning in the hospital sector requires input from elected political representatives.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014Article
- Achieving minimum caseload requirements--an analysis of hospital discharge data from 2005-2011.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLegally mandated minimum hospital caseload requirements for certain invasive procedures, including pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, and some types of organ transplantation, have been in effect in Germany since 2004. The goal of such requirements is to improve patient care by ensuring that patients undergo certain procedures only in hospitals that have met the corresponding minimum caseload requirement. We used the case numbers published in legally mandated hospital quality control reports to determine whether the hospitals actually met the stipulated requirements.
methodWe performed a secondary analysis of data supplied by hospitals in their quality control reports for the years 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2010 with respect to six procedures that have a minimum caseload requirement: complex interventions on the esophagus and pancreas, total knee replacement, and hepatic, renal, and stem-cell transplantation.
resultsThe total case numbers for these six different procedures rose from 22 064 (0.1% of all procedures) in 2004 to 170 801 (0.9% of all procedures) in 2010. From 2006 onward, procedures to which minimum caseload requirements apply have been carried out in half of all hospitals studied. These procedures account for 0.9% of all inpatient cases in Germany. The percentage of hospitals that continue to perform certain procedures despite not having met the minimum caseload requirement ranged from 5% to 45%, depending on the type of procedure, and the percentage of cases carried out in such hospitals ranged from 1% to 15%. These values remained nearly constant for each of the six minimum caseload requirements over the 4 reporting years for which data were examined.
conclusionThe establishment of minimum caseload requirements in Germany in 2004 did not lessen the number of cases performed in violation of these requirements over the period 2004 to 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.