Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25220021›Full record

ReviewPhotochemistry and photobiology

Forty years of research on xeroderma pigmentosum at the US National Institutes of Health.

Kenneth H Kraemer, John J DiGiovanna

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photochemistry and photobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutics of xeroderma pigmentosum: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review.Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Update on Recommendations for Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Children with Genomic Instability Disorders.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  9. Frequencies and spectra of aflatoxin BNAR molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Genetic predisposition in pediatric oncology.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2020
    Review
  16. Why Do the Cosmic Rays Induce Aging?Frontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth H KraemerDermatology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
John J DiGiovanna
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

DNA Repair in Human Cancer-Prone Genetic DiseasesZIABC004517 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KRAEMER, KENNETH H · 2009 to 2024
$26.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC004517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1968, Dr. James Cleaver reported defective DNA repair in cultured cells from patients with xeroderma pigmentosum. This link between clinical disease and molecular pathophysiology has sparked interest in understanding not only the clinical characteristics of sun sensitivity, damage and cancer that occurred in XP patients but also the mechanisms underlying the damage and repair. While affected patients are rare, their exaggerated UV damage provides a window into the workings of DNA repair. These studies have clarified the importance of a functioning DNA repair system to the maintenance of skin and neurologic health in the general population. Understanding the role of damage in causing cancer, neurologic degeneration, hearing loss and internal cancers provides an opportunity for prevention and treatment. Characterizing complementation groups pointed to the importance of different underlying genes. Studying differences in cancer age of onset and underlying molecular signatures in cancers occurring either in XP patients or the general population has led to insights into differences in carcinogenic mechanisms. The accelerated development of cancers in XP has been used as a model to discover new cancer chemopreventive agents. An astute insight can be a "tipping point" triggering decades of productive inquiry.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAge of OnsetAnticarcinogenic AgentsDNA DamageDNA, NeoplasmHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIsotretinoinMelanomaNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)SkinSkin NeoplasmsUltraviolet RaysUnited StatesXeroderma PigmentosumAnticarcinogenic AgentsDNA, NeoplasmIsotretinoin

Identifiers

PMID25220021
PMCPMC4355260
OpenAlexW2010501611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.