ArticleCryobiology2014
A scale down process for the development of large volume cryopreservation.
Article in Cryobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ultrasonic rewarming of cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a single-use bioartificial liver (BAL) biocartridge consisting of cryopreservable alginate encapsulated liver cell spheroids as a component of HepatiCan™, a novel bioartificial liver device.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Cryopreservation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Medical Grade Ice Nucleation Inducer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- A clinical-scale BioArtificial Liver, developed for GMP, improved clinical parameters of liver function in porcine liver failure.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Cryopreservation and re-culture of a 2.3 litre biomass for use in a bioartificial liver device.PloS one · 2017Article
- Spatial considerations during cryopreservation of a large volume sample.Cryobiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Impact of Storage at -80°C on Encapsulated Liver Spheroids After Liquid Nitrogen Storage.BioResearch open access · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The process of ice formation and propagation during cryopreservation impacts on the post-thaw outcome for a sample. Two processes, either network solidification or progressive solidification, can dominate the water-ice phase transition with network solidification typically present in small sample cryo-straws or cryo-vials. Progressive solidification is more often observed in larger volumes or environmental freezing. These different ice phase progressions could have a significant impact on cryopreservation in scale-up and larger volume cryo-banking protocols necessitating their study when considering cell therapy applications. This study determines the impact of these different processes on alginate encapsulated liver spheroids (ELS) as a model system during cryopreservation, and develops a method to replicate these differences in an economical manner. It was found in the current studies that progressive solidification resulted in fewer, but proportionally more viable cells 24h post-thaw compared with network solidification. The differences between the groups diminished at later time points post-thaw as cells recovered the ability to undertake cell division, with no statistically significant differences seen by either 48 h or 72 h in recovery cultures. Thus progressive solidification itself should not prove a significant hurdle in the search for successful cryopreservation in large volumes. However, some small but significant differences were noted in total viable cell recoveries and functional assessments between samples cooled with either progressive or network solidification, and these require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.