ReviewSeminars in radiation oncology2014
The genetic signatures of pediatric high-grade glioma: no longer a one-act play.
Review in Seminars in radiation oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying radiation therapy response using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parametric mapping of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a report from the pediatric brain tumor consortium.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Trial
- Review
- Epigenetic mechanisms and therapeutic advances in diffuse midline glioma (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Therapeutically targeting the unique disease landscape of pediatric high-grade gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Novel Pharmacological Treatment Options in Pediatric Glioblastoma-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Review
- Epigenomics and immunotherapeutic advances in pediatric brain tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor Signaling in Pediatric Nervous System Tumors: Implications for Malignancy and Cancer Stem Cell Enrichment.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Brain Tumor Biobank Development for Precision Medicine: Role of the Neurosurgeon.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Ad-CD40L mobilizes CD4 T cells for the treatment of brainstem tumors.Neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Invited Review: Emerging functions of histone H3 mutations in paediatric diffuse high-grade gliomas.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2020Review
- WHO grade has no prognostic value in the pediatric high-grade glioma included in the HERBY trial.Neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Modulating autophagy as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of paediatric high-grade glioma.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- H3K27M, IDH1, and ATRX expression in pediatric GBM and their clinical and prognostic significance.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019Article
- Paediatric gliomas: diagnosis, molecular biology and management.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Improving Diagnostic and Therapeutic Outcomes in Pediatric Brain Tumors.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2018Review
- Genomics of adult and pediatric solid tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2018Review
- Malignant Gliomas as Second Neoplasms in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Neuropathological Study.BioMed research international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in understanding pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) genetics have revealed key differences between pHGG and adult HGG and have uncovered unique molecular drivers among subgroups within pHGG. The 3 core adult HGG pathways, the receptor tyrosine kinase-Ras-phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase, p53, and retinoblastoma networks, are also disrupted in pHGG, but they exhibit a different spectrum of effectors targeted by mutation. There are also similarities and differences in the genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and pediatric nonbrainstem (pNBS)-HGG. In 2012, histone H3 mutations were identified in nearly 80% of DIPGs and ~35% of pNBS-HGG. These were the first reports of histone mutations in human cancer, implicating novel biology in pediatric gliomagenesis. Additionally, DIPG and midline pNBS-HGG vary in the frequency and specific histone H3 amino acid substitution compared with pNBS-HGGs arising in the cerebral hemispheres, demonstrating a molecular difference among pHGG subgroups. The gene expression signatures as well as DNA methylation signatures of these tumors are also distinctive, reflecting a combination of the driving mutations and the developmental context from which they arise. These data collectively highlight unique selective pressures within the developing brainstem and solidify DIPG as a specific molecular and biological entity among pHGGs. Emerging studies continue to identify novel mutations that distinguish subgroups of pHGG. The molecular heterogeneity among pHGGs will undoubtedly have clinical implications moving forward. The discovery of unique oncogenic drivers is a critical first step in providing patients with appropriate, targeted therapies. Despite these insights, our vantage point has been largely limited to an in-depth analysis of protein coding sequences. Given the clear importance of histone mutations in pHGG, it will be interesting to see how aberrant epigenetic regulation contributes to tumorigenesis in the pediatric context. New mechanistic insights may allow for the identification of distinct vulnerabilities in this devastating spectrum of childhood tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.