Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25219686›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2015

Chronic care management for substance dependence in primary care among patients with co-occurring disorders.

Tae Woo Park, Debbie M Cheng, Jeffrey H Samet, Michael R Winter, Richard Saitz

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary healthcare approach to substance abuse management.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae Woo ParkDr. Park is with the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (e-mail: tpark1@lifespan.org ). Dr. Cheng is with the Department of Biostatistics and Mr. Winter is with the Data Coordinating Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston. Dr. Samet is with the Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston. Dr. Saitz is with the Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston.
Debbie M Cheng
Jeffrey H Samet
Michael R Winter
Richard Saitz
Boston University · US

Funding

LINKAGE OF ALCOHOL ABUSERS TO PRIMARY CARER01AA010870 · NIAAA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAITZ, RICHARD · 1996 to 2009
$4.5M
Advancing Clinical Research Training within Addiction Residency ProgramsR25DA033211 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI Patrick O'Connor, JEFFREY H. SAMET · 2012 to 2026
$4.2M
ENHANCED LINKAGE OF DRUG ABUSERS TO PRIMARY MEDICAL CARER01DA010019 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAMET, JEFFREY H. · 1996 to 2010
$3.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010870NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA010870NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010019NIDA NIH HHS R01DA010019NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA033211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCo-occurring mental and substance use disorders are associated with worse outcomes than a single disorder alone. In this exploratory subgroup analysis of a randomized trial, the authors hypothesized that providing chronic care management (CCM) for substance dependence in a primary care setting would have a beneficial effect among persons with substance dependence and major depressive disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

methodsAdults (N=563) with alcohol dependence, drug dependence, or both were assigned to CCM or usual primary care. CCM was provided by a nurse care manager, social worker, internist, and psychiatrist. Clinical outcomes (any use of opioids or stimulants or heavy drinking and severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms) and treatment utilization (emergency department use and hospitalization) were measured at three, six, and 12 months after enrollment. Longitudinal regression models were used to compare randomized arms within the subgroups of participants with major depressive disorder or PTSD.

resultsAmong all participants, 79% met criteria for major depressive disorder and 36% met criteria for PTSD at baseline. No significant effect of CCM was observed within either subgroup for any outcome, including any use of opioids or stimulants or heavy drinking, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and any hospitalizations or number of nights hospitalized. Among participants with depression, those receiving CCM had fewer days in the emergency department compared with the control group, but the finding was of only borderline significance (p=.06).

conclusionsAmong patients with co-occurring substance dependence and mental disorders, CCM was not significantly more effective than usual care for improving clinical outcomes or treatment utilization.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPrimary Health CareAdultChronic DiseaseComorbidityDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)FemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25219686
PMCPMC4282827
OpenAlexW2154367391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.