Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25218718›Full record

ArticleAppetite2014

Low-income women's conceptualizations of emotional- and stress-eating.

Lenwood W Hayman, Hannah J Lee, Alison L Miller, Julie C Lumeng

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lenwood W HaymanCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: lwhayman@umich.edu.
Hannah J LeeCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alison L MillerCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Julie C LumengCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Self-Regulation as a Biological Mechanism for Excess Weight Gain in ToddlersR01HD069179 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MILLER, ALISON L · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD069179NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069179NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional- and stress-eating have been proposed as risk factors for obesity. However, the way that individuals conceptualize these behaviors is not well understood and no studies have employed a qualitative approach. We sought to understand how women conceptualize emotional- and stress-eating. Sixty-one low-income women from South-central Michigan with young children (ages 2-5 years) participated in either a focus group or individual semi-structured interview during which they were asked about their conceptualizations of eating behaviors among adults and children. Responses were transcribed and the constant comparative method was used to identify themes. Identified themes included that emotional- and stress-eating are viewed as uncommon, severe, pitiable behaviors that reflect a lack of self-control and are highly stigmatized; that when these behaviors occurred among children, the behaviors resulted from neglect or even abuse; and that bored-eating is viewed as distinct from emotional- or stress-eating and is a common and humorous behavior with which participants readily self-identified. Future research and interventions should seek to develop more detailed conceptualizations of these behaviors to improve measurement, destigmatize emotional- and stress-eating and potentially capitalize on the strong identification with bored-eating by targeting this behavior for interventions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeModels, PsychologicalStress, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultBoredomChild AbuseCommunity Health CentersFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding and Eating Disorders of ChildhoodFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaternal BehaviorMichiganMiddle AgedBored-eatingEmotional-eatingLow-income womenObesityOverweightStress-eating

Identifiers

PMID25218718
PMCPMC4253654
OpenAlexW2064841306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.