ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2015
Correcting for the free energy costs of bond or angle constraints in molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantum-Centric Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Insights and Challenges in Correcting Force Field Based Solvation Free Energies Using a Neural Network Potential.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Accurate and Efficient Multilevel Free Energy Simulations with Neural Network-Assisted Enhanced Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Integration of Experimental Data and Use of Automated Fitting Methods in Developing Protein Force Fields.Communications chemistry · 2022Review
- Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces.Interface focus · 2020Article
- Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- Multi-level free energy simulation with a staged transformation approach.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
- Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Echo dephasing and heat capacity from constrained and unconstrained dynamics of triiodothyronine nuclear receptor protein.Journal of biological physics · 2019Article
- The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: "HiPen", a New Dataset for Validating (S)QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Accelerating QM/MM Free Energy Computations via Intramolecular Force Matching.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018Article
- A Comparison of QM/MM Simulations with and without the Drude Oscillator Model Based on Hydration Free Energies of Simple Solutes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
- On the convergence of multi-scale free energy simulations.Molecular simulation · 2018Article
- Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Constrained Molecular Dynamics as Gibbs Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2017Article
- Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pKJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016Article
- Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016Article
- An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFree energy simulations are an important tool in the arsenal of computational biophysics, allowing the calculation of thermodynamic properties of binding or enzymatic reactions. This paper introduces methods to increase the accuracy and precision of free energy calculations by calculating the free energy costs of constraints during post-processing. The primary purpose of employing constraints for these free energy methods is to increase the phase space overlap between ensembles, which is required for accuracy and convergence.
methodsThe free energy costs of applying or removing constraints are calculated as additional explicit steps in the free energy cycle. The new techniques focus on hard degrees of freedom and use both gradients and Hessian estimation. Enthalpy, vibrational entropy, and Jacobian free energy terms are considered.
resultsWe demonstrate the utility of this method with simple classical systems involving harmonic and anharmonic oscillators, four-atomic benchmark systems, an alchemical mutation of ethane to methanol, and free energy simulations between alanine and serine. The errors for the analytical test cases are all below 0.0007kcal/mol, and the accuracy of the free energy results of ethane to methanol is improved from 0.15 to 0.04kcal/mol. For the alanine to serine case, the phase space overlaps of the unconstrained simulations range between 0.15 and 0.9%. The introduction of constraints increases the overlap up to 2.05%. On average, the overlap increases by 94% relative to the unconstrained value and precision is doubled.
conclusionsThe approach reduces errors arising from constraints by about an order of magnitude. Free energy simulations benefit from the use of constraints through enhanced convergence and higher precision. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The primary utility of this approach is to calculate free energies for systems with disparate energy surfaces and bonded terms, especially in multi-scale molecular mechanics/quantum mechanics simulations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Recent developments of molecular dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.