Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25218579›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Patellofemoral resurfacing and patellar denervation in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Alisara Arirachakaran, Chanchit Sangkaew, Jatupon Kongtharvonskul

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Is patellar denervation necessary in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Does patellar denervation reduce post-operative anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Increased in vivo patellofemoral loading after total knee arthroplasty in resurfaced patellae.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alisara ArirachakaranOrthopedics Department, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, amy.alisara@gmail.com.
Chanchit Sangkaew
Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Police General Hospital · THRamathibodi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of comparing relevant clinical outcomes between patellar denervation, resurfacing and non-resurfacing.

methodsA database search was performed using PubMed and Scopus search engines. RCTs or quasi-experimental designs comparing clinical outcomes between treatments by a search of articles dated from inception to October 23, 2012. Unstandardized mean difference (UMD) and random effects methods were applied for pooling continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. A longitudinal mixed regression model was used for network meta-analysis to indirectly compare treatment effects.

resultsEighteen of 315 studies identified were eligible. Compared with patellar non-resurfacing, patellar denervation had a UMD that displayed a significant improvement in symptoms with values in pain visual analog score (VAS) and Knee Society Score (KSS) of -0.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.13, -0.25] and 2.55 (95% CI 0.43, 4.68), respectively. The UMD in VAS, KSS, and Knee Function Score (KFS) in patellar resurfacing showed no significant improvement in symptoms when compared to non-resurfacing. Patients who underwent surgery with patellar resurfacing had a lower reoperation rates with pooled relative risks (RRs) of 0.69 (95% CI 0.50, 0.94) when compared to non-resurfacing. The network meta-analysis suggested a benefit of borderline significance for patellar denervation with a pooled RR of 0.63 (95% CI 0.38, 1.03), showing that there is a lower chance of anterior knee pain when compared to non-resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing also displays a significantly lower chance of reoperation with a pooled RR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50, 0.92) when compared to non-resurfacing. Multiple active treatment comparisons indicated that patellar denervation resulted in greater improvement in KFS than patellar resurfacing.

conclusionThis review suggests that either patellar denervation or patellar resurfacing may be selected for the management of the patellofemoral component in total knee replacement. Patellar denervation may help improve postoperative knee function, but does not improve pain when compared to patellar resurfacing.

Indexed as

DenervationArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneePatellaPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID25218579
OpenAlexW1972378847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.